schauberger anitigravity engine undiscusible with a bit of imagination

[raaaid]

first 180º the cable will hardly pull on you

next 180º the cable will pull you a lot

why?

cause in one your giving away cable while in other youre recovering, outwards or inwards spiral made by the cannonball

you gotta visualize it traditional fisics say both halfs pull the same but even my physics teacher admited from this explanation you would got one pull bigger in one half than the other and therefore thrust

as a matter of fact i got a patent granted for a mechanical(instead of fluids) vortex engine like schaubergers but lost it for not paying the fees

edit:

a 40% probablity is gravity being produced by looping electrons like this so you can achieve this mecanically with fluids of directly on atoms making the electrons loop the loop:

if this guy looped the looped fast enoguh he would be propelled up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox_UUc3xin4

[winny]

Still don't get it.

Surley if you attach a cable to a spinning cannonball then all that will happen is the cable will wind around the ball?

[raaaid]

thanks for your time really apreciate it

you use one of this and instead of fish a fast cannonaball:



on the first 180º the cannonball makes a very open outwards spiral for your giving away cable, on the next 180º the opposite

[Sternjaeger II]

stop trolling.

[raaaid]

maybe im trolling

if trolling is to have a nice conversation world wide with the use of new tech on antigravity

natzis pay lot of attention to schauberger

its history he was taken to a prosoner camp to build his supposed antigravity turbines

[winny]

Originally Posted by raaaid

thanks for your time really apreciate it

you use one of this and instead of fish a fast cannonaball:


on the first 180º the cannonball makes a very open outwards spiral for your giving away cable, on the next 180º the opposite

I understand the spool part, what i dont understand is how the cable at the other end (cannonball end) doesn't just wrap it's self around the ball. It has to. If the ball is spinning. The ball is spinning?

[raaaid]

thats a very good point, i hadnt thought about it, the cannonball could behave like a yoyo

but this is indifferent just neglect it

do you agree that when you give away cable it will pull less that when you recover cable though both paths are simetrical?

this is the crux of the antigravity concept and takes to electrons behaving like that and producing thrust at atomic level or gravity

[winny]

Originally Posted by raaaid

thats a very good point, i hadnt thought about it, the cannonball could behave like a yoyo

but this is indifferent just neglect it

do you agree that when you give away cable it will pull less that when you recover cable though both paths are simetrical?

this is the crux of the antigravity concept and takes to electrons behaving like that and producing thrust at atomic level or gravity

Ok, i see now. The cannonball analogy threw me.

When it goes right down to sub-atomic it gets very wierd, who knows if the concept of anti-gravity is right. In fact there's no point thinking about it unless you're some sort of physics genius. It's too abstract. I'm better at dippy birds.

[raaaid]

well its us mainly who sets the limits

do you understand now that that looping yoyo video is producing some thrust since the inwards part pulls harder than the outwards part and both last the same?

schauberger antigravity turbines work on this principle

according physics this is wrong but i think the cannonball analogy with the spool lets you see it in your minds eye