Effect for next update...

[Kittle]

I am running a fairly crap computer from 2009, and I mean it was fairly crap then. Dual core AMD @ 2.5ghz, 3 GB RAM, nVidia 9800GT 512MB, and I run these effects just fine. I have to say I think most people will be able to run these just fine these days.

[Alan Grey]

Visual Effects Overhaul Update 14
WIP visual effects for IL2 Sturmovik 1946

[swiss]

me likes.

[Blaf]

Nice! Just... i would maybe shorten the tracers a bit.

[Mysticpuma]

I'd be interested to see what a burning bomber looks like? I see lots of smoking debris, but what happens when an engine becomes a 'smoker'?

Looks great so-far and something that I wish had been there from day one

Cheers, MP

[nic727]

Originally Posted by Mysticpuma

I'd be interested to see what a burning bomber looks like? I see lots of smoking debris, but what happens when an engine becomes a 'smoker'?

Looks great so-far and something that I wish had been there from day one

Cheers, MP

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwz_t...hannel&list=UL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwL04...hannel&list=UL

[ElAurens]

So, what is the frame rate hit, really?

I cannot believe that with that much partical effect being rendered all over that it is not seriously degrading frame rates.

You could see it in the P-38 sequence.

Too much smoke frome the ship stacks as well, those are not coal burners.

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by ElAurens

So, what is the frame rate hit, really?

I cannot believe that with that much partical effect being rendered all over that it is not seriously degrading frame rates.

You could see it in the P-38 sequence.

Too much smoke frome the ship stacks as well, those are not coal burners.

I think there will be a bit of a hit but I think the penalty can be made quite small. Still a lot of simple bitmaps being manipulated in some very clever ways.