Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2012, 01:26 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post


Are we really gonna have this conversation??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post


JtD, they flat out state the stick fixed longitudinal stability is unacceptable. That is the NACA, not me.

Why do you think bob-weights were added to the design to fix the longitudinal stability?

I can't help it if you're confused: the-reason-inertia-weights-were-introduced-was-because-Spitfire Vs-were-being-badly-loaded-at-an-operational-level-in-1942. As more operational equipment was introduced some squadrons were ignoring the loading diagrams. It had nothing to do with the NACA report.

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 07-27-2012 at 01:33 AM.
  #2  
Old 07-27-2012, 01:54 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
it was statistically established that, as soon as the longitudinal stability of the Spitfire was thus brought under control
Why don't you read the Operating notes for any early mark Spitfire.

"longitudinal instability" is used often....

I am sure the Spitfire Mark V increase in weight and speed caused an unmistakeable as well as difficult to ignore increase in in-flight break ups.
__________________
  #3  
Old 07-27-2012, 04:01 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
I am sure the Spitfire Mark V increase in weight and speed caused an unmistakeable as well as difficult to ignore increase in in-flight break ups.
Nope, you are quoting well out of context: what caused some break-ups was poor loading by the squadrons, as was explained by Jeffrey Quill:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
Quill
"In general configuration the Mk I and Mk II production aeroplanes were almost identical to the prototype and so there was no problem with their stability." (231-232)

"Therefore, for each sub-variant of the Mk V detailed instructions for the correct loading of the aircraft were issued to squadrons....However the importance of these loading instructions was not generally appreciated in squadrons and in the daily round of operational activity they tended to be disregarded." Once the bobweights had been introduced and, in later marks, the modified mass balances on the elevators...it was statistically established that, as soon as the longitudinal stability of the Spitfire was thus brought under control, the problem of the unexplained breakings-up of aircraft in mid-air,...'softly and suddenly vanished away'." (page 238 )


Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.