![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
One other contributing aspect is that a change in wingloading often changes the relative positons of the center of gravity and center of lift. This influences the trim drag. CG position has to be optimized in order to minimize trim drag at high speeds. However, optimal CG placement for high-speed flight might be prohibitive due to stability/safety reasons. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Understood Papafly, but the N is still a bit heavier than the E which is faster than the N in the numbers I have ready at hand.
Odd.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm, maybe a difference in trim drag?
As long as we don't have reliable top speed figures we can only speculate... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
HyperLobby Stock 1946 "Kiwi@War" =============================================== Dell MB i7 860 @2.80ghz 8gb GB_Nv550Ti OC 1gb SB Audigy Saitek X45 Saitek Trottle Quadrant SSD Boot, SAS Raid Data |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd always recommend these pages:
http://www.raafwarbirds.org.au/targe...e/p40_data.htm http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/P-40/P-40.html |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|