![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And swindling, doesn't work, vague crap, misdirecting? Thats pure badmouthing from your side. They give us information, not the information you would like to get, but they confirm that they are working on the solution of CoD's problems. It's not their fault that you are so unfaithful. ![]()
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its not a matter of being unfaithful, this could be a really great flight sim unfortunataly it was mis managed and rushed out the door, frustration is what I would call it. Anyway im off down the pub.
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tell that to the folks that run XP and DX9. They got swindled, pure and simple.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They dont give a hoot about the COD DX9 guys, DX9 has been pony from the start, they are only making sure DX9 is ok for the MMO.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can you explain why exactly DX9 is essential for an MMO?
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I never said it was essential, im saying the DX9 fix is for the next release, the DX9 fix for COD is just a bi-product.
If they HAD to fix DX9 for COD because its on the box, it would have been done before release.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So why do they need to bother fixing DX9 at all then?
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition Last edited by bongodriver; 06-23-2012 at 08:56 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last warning Force10 you have been deliberately and overtly negative and distorting the facts for some time. Enough is enough. If you dont like the current state of the game, go and have a little break and do something else constructive somewhere else before we are forced to give you one. The same goes for anyone else that isnt enjoying it. Have a break, get a life, Im sure your family and friends dont like you in this mood so go do something you enjoy and come back and comment when the next patch is out. Everything that needed to be said about the last official patch and latest DX10 alpha patch has already been said. DX9 and XP support still exists in the current latest official patch. DX9 was removed from the DX10 alpha/beta patch to enable better trouble shooting of core graphics engine issues.. DX9 has it's own peculiarities so it is being addressed separately. DX9 subject is now closed! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|