Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Do you use or intend to use DirectX 9?
No I do not and I don`t think it should be supported at this stage anymore 254 90.07%
Yes I do and will do so in the future 28 9.93%
Voters: 282. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2012, 12:41 AM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

the 15% was from Black6's official word about the DX9's %, not from a poll on a forum
  #2  
Old 06-19-2012, 01:20 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys View Post
the 15% was from Black6's official word about the DX9's %, not from a poll on a forum
Possibly - it doesn't alter the fact that 1C have said they are going to support DX9, nor does it alter the fact that we don't know what contractual obligations they may have. Without such information, we are in no position to say anything useful on the issue.
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2.
OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung.
Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous.
  #3  
Old 06-19-2012, 01:30 AM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

1. The decision to have Steam in CLOD was made by 1C Corporate.

2. 1C Corporate is not going to abandon what they see as 15% of the market.

3. DX9's inclusion is non-negotiable.


This thread is done.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #4  
Old 06-19-2012, 03:29 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Why is evryone so hell bent on keeping DX9 support?

I doubt any DX9 level cards would even run the interface at an acceptable frame rate.

Hell my 7970 runs slower when forced to use DX9 code, and I have yet to see anyone running CoD on an nVidia FX or ATI XT series card. Are those cards even supported in the specs of CoD?

DX9 support = use of an outdated API level, shrinking user base in terms of hardware, unessesary overhead in maintaining code.

Time to move on people.

Last edited by Codex; 06-19-2012 at 03:38 AM.
  #5  
Old 06-19-2012, 03:36 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Why is evryone so hell bent on keeping DX9 support?
I don't know that anyone is. It isn't our decision though, and we don't know the reasons for the decision. How is this so difficult to comprehend?
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2.
OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung.
Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.