One can see that people are moving on...

[proton45]

Originally Posted by Rowddy

better this way then 500 pages with trolls and whinning

Thats my feeling as well...I remember when the original "IL2 Sturmovik" came out years ago & their was a lot of obnoxious activity in the forums. The primary tone was aggression, as opposed to wining, but none the less it was very off-putting. I stepped away for a year or so (honestly I dont remember how long it was), and when I came back the crowd had thinned down to a crew of truly good people. Somehow the tone and spirit of the forum had improved as the ranks thinned.

I kind of miss those days...

[priller26]

Iron front is enjoyable...that being said, no matter how good a game is, people will eventually move on to something that peaks their interest and takes advantage of new hardware/graphic capabilities. When something just works poorly, with no real fix in site, people move on faster. August, and summer holidays for most Russians (Moscovites) is quickly approaching, if nothing new appears before then, then maybe this fall. If not, I assume this place will become rather deserted.

[Icebear]

Originally Posted by priller26

Iron front is enjoyable...that being said, no matter how good a game is, people will eventually move on to something that peaks their interest and takes advantage of new hardware/graphic capabilities. When something just works poorly, with no real fix in site, people move on faster. August, and summer holidays for most Russians (Moscovites) is quickly approaching, if nothing new appears before then, then maybe this fall. If not, I assume this place will become rather deserted.

I don't think so. This place is too funny to become deserted. They will rush out the sequel and we will all forget about Cliffs of Dover...at least the ones who are really willing to buy the sequel.

And if the sequel will base on Cliffs of Dover there will enough topics of conversation for another "two weeks".

[Flanker35M]

S!

The circle will never cease New sim and same old arguments