Busy Building whilie I wait

[hc_wolf]

Buchon,

I agree, they are there just tuned way down. All the groundwork is done in having it in the engine an I understand why they are tuned down also, because it is best to build the new graphics engine then turn it all up again ( I hope ).

This was not a bash thread, just a look back and remind everyone just how much more we have awaiting us in the next patch and beyond. Now.... Back to scripting.

[Lurker_71]

It is becoming increasingly hard to make an observation/comment on IL2CoD without sounding like being critical of this or that feature. Sadly very little to see here, except soap.

[Buchon]

Originally Posted by hc_wolf

Buchon,

I agree, they are there just tuned way down. All the groundwork is done in having it in the engine an I understand why they are tuned down also, because it is best to build the new graphics engine then turn it all up again ( I hope ).

This was not a bash thread, just a look back and remind everyone just how much more we have awaiting us in the next patch and beyond. Now.... Back to scripting.

Those flames did not reached even the release date so I don't think that they are tuned down due the work in the graphics engine.

Like you I still hope for a return of those effects and a better lighting with a better use of HDR but I have more hopes in tweak it by my self, using an injector or tweaking the files.

It will not be the first game fixed by my self for my self.

[ATAG_MajorBorris]

Thanks Wolf, your work on the mission's is greatly appreciated

[hc_wolf]

Originally Posted by ATAG_MajorBorris

Thanks Wolf, your work on the mission's is greatly appreciated

I got something special coming for ATAG.

Hey I am in New Orleans from June 6-9. Anyone that way?

[ATAG_Snapper]

I wonder if 1C would consider releasing TWO versions of CoD; "CoD Lite" (for the Win XP DX9 systems) and "COD Heavy Duty" (for Vista/Win 7 DX10/11 systems). That way legal obligations to continue support for older Win XP systems would be fulfilled, yet 1C wouldn't be hamstrung in further development of BoM (not to mention further updates of CoD Heavy Duty).

This thought occurred to me yesterday after purchasing Disastersoft's excellent "Wick vs Dundas" add on for CoD. They offer two downloads -- one is designed for slower systems and isn't as heavily populated with objects/aircraft etc to keep framerates acceptable. Purchase of one version entitles you to a download of the other should you need or desire it.

[Luftwaffepilot]

If they don't drop DX 9 support with BoM they're simply stupid.

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by Luftwaffepilot

If they don't drop DX 9 support with BoM they're simply stupid.

Way to go with yer statement there. Tell them how it is done.

[Icebear]

Originally Posted by Luftwaffepilot

If they don't drop DX 9 support with BoM they're simply stupid.

Well they are simply stupid if they drop DX9 and implement DX10 instead of DX11 ! Even Microsoft dropped DX10 as it was buggy and unstable.

It really hurts to see what is left from all this more than one year later.....

[Thee_oddball]

Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper

I wonder if 1C would consider releasing TWO versions of CoD; "CoD Lite" (for the Win XP DX9 systems) and "COD Heavy Duty" (for Vista/Win 7 DX10/11 systems). That way legal obligations to continue support for older Win XP systems would be fulfilled, yet 1C wouldn't be hamstrung in further development of BoM (not to mention further updates of CoD Heavy Duty).

This thought occurred to me yesterday after purchasing Disastersoft's excellent "Wick vs Dundas" add on for CoD. They offer two downloads -- one is designed for slower systems and isn't as heavily populated with objects/aircraft etc to keep framerates acceptable. Purchase of one version entitles you to a download of the other should you need or desire it.

no need, there are plenty of big titles that support both 9c and 11 without the need for 2 versions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...Released_games