Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Based on the information presented in this thread alone I think it is safe to say it was far more than a couple!

May be so - I just retained from the discussion that 100 octane was used - and I got bored of the discussion if it was all or some squadrons - which would not change a bit of what I think

If the 100 octane was used on a regular basis it should be present. I wish to retain the 87 octaine spit because we might want to create pre BoB scenarii in the future (Dunkirque for instance) and it would be a shame to eliminate the 87 octane spit from the game which would prevent any historical mission for pre BoB scenarii.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow

May be so - I just retained from the discussion that 100 octane was used - and I got bored of the discussion if it was all or some squadrons - which would not change a bit of what I think

I like you feel there is enough proof that it was used.. As I noted I think the only argument left is how widly it was used.. Which is where I left it, but since you decided to add the qualifier of 'a couple' I felt the need to point out that based on all the info presented here in this thread 'I' think it is safe to say it is 'far' more than a couple.. How far? Who knows and who really cares wrt to CoD and the comming sequal! I think most of the adults here would agree that there is enough proof to justify the addition of a 100 oct variant at some point, be it the next sequal or later.. For me the sooner the better