Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2012, 03:38 PM
AlarmedBread AlarmedBread is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Default

Wish it was possible to just drop DX9 and any relic support so we could have a game, it's silly to continue support of these ancient technologies. Some of us with decent rigs would like you to put more stuff into the game and let us really use our hardware. Keep up the good work.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2012, 04:13 PM
Volksieg Volksieg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Berkshire UK
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlarmedBread View Post
Wish it was possible to just drop DX9 and any relic support so we could have a game, it's silly to continue support of these ancient technologies. Some of us with decent rigs would like you to put more stuff into the game and let us really use our hardware. Keep up the good work.
+ 1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2012, 04:18 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

I was thinking the same. Maybe this isnt possible due to legal issues (Dx9 Support mentioned on the box or sth. similar?) for CoD but they should consider dropping Dx9 for the sequel to ease future advances in the graphic engine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2012, 04:28 PM
Gourmand Gourmand is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 208
Default

Graphic card who works with clod are all dx11 ready

dx9 is useless for this game
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2012, 04:29 PM
Volksieg Volksieg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Berkshire UK
Posts: 348
Default

That's the thing.... people just have to move with the times and realise that sticking with XP means missing out on future titles. If they need XP for something (In my case drivers for various musical knick-knacks etc) then they need to set up a dual boot system just like I did. There just isn't any need or even excuse for Direct X 9 anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2012, 05:00 PM
Luftwaffepilot Luftwaffepilot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 153
Default

Why not do a representative poll on this forum about who needs DX 9
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2012, 05:26 PM
Walrus1 Walrus1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luftwaffepilot View Post
Why not do a representative poll on this forum about who needs DX 9
Unfortunately, I bet the answer in the Russian forum would be significantly different than the one here.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2012, 05:28 PM
Volksieg Volksieg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Berkshire UK
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus1 View Post
Unfortunately, I bet the answer in the Russian forum would be significantly different than the one here.
Good point.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2012, 06:20 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luftwaffepilot View Post
Why not do a representative poll on this forum about who needs DX 9
Because this forum is not representative for the customer base 1C and Ubisoft have to take into consideration?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:53 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by III/JG53_Don View Post
for CoD but they should consider dropping Dx9 for the sequel to ease future advances in the graphic engine.
Agreed 100%

Even though the DX11 API supports DX9, 10 and 11 I think any effort working on DX9 is a waste of time. That and the added benifit of dropping DX9 support would get rid of most of the complaints by those flying with full settings on a 8 year old PC
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.