![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wish it was possible to just drop DX9 and any relic support so we could have a game, it's silly to continue support of these ancient technologies. Some of us with decent rigs would like you to put more stuff into the game and let us really use our hardware. Keep up the good work.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was thinking the same. Maybe this isnt possible due to legal issues (Dx9 Support mentioned on the box or sth. similar?) for CoD but they should consider dropping Dx9 for the sequel to ease future advances in the graphic engine.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Graphic card who works with clod are all dx11 ready
dx9 is useless for this game |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's the thing.... people just have to move with the times and realise that sticking with XP means missing out on future titles. If they need XP for something (In my case drivers for various musical knick-knacks etc) then they need to set up a dual boot system just like I did.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not do a representative poll on this forum about who needs DX 9
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unfortunately, I bet the answer in the Russian forum would be significantly different than the one here.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good point.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Even though the DX11 API supports DX9, 10 and 11 I think any effort working on DX9 is a waste of time. That and the added benifit of dropping DX9 support would get rid of most of the complaints by those flying with full settings on a 8 year old PC
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|