Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-03-2012, 03:21 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Yes i agee, sometime in the near future im hoping the hardware will be developed that will allow us to use FSAA in a flightsim.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-03-2012, 03:28 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Yes i agee, sometime in the near future im hoping the hardware will be developed that will allow us to use FSAA in a flightsim.
In the mean time you may want to check out the following 3rd party utils

JSGME FXAA and SMAA utils
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-03-2012, 03:34 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

I have, about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-03-2012, 03:45 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
I have, about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
Furhter proof.. same game.. differnt PC.. different results
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-03-2012, 03:58 PM
Kankkis Kankkis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 584
Default

Buchon's MSAA worked well for me, look absolutely great sim now, i'll really enjoy flying it now, even more than RoF, and i'm big RoF fan, bought it right after release in russia(1 week), there was very much problems too. When was UK release(about half year after russia) it was better shape, but bugs there and there.

Last edited by Kankkis; 03-03-2012 at 04:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-03-2012, 03:59 PM
DroopSnoot DroopSnoot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Furhter proof.. same game.. differnt PC.. different results
While i agree with you AoA, i also think that if your pc meets the specs then you shouldnt have to buy new hardware to play the game well.
I will lol if all those who bought new hardware didnt need to with the correction made to the patch...but i dont have that much faith in the Devs so no lols for me.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:02 PM
Jugdriver's Avatar
Jugdriver Jugdriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steuben View Post
It seems CLOD does not like AMD at all!
That is part of it, COD is not optimized for multi core CPU’s very well and it is still a very CPU dependent game. My card is only working at 30% but one of my CPU cores is working at 85% to 90% (the others are going at 20% to 30%). Over clocking gave me solid gains and I plan to push my CPU as close to 4Ghz as I can, but unless the developers are able to make COD take more advantage of other cores I think the Intel guys are going to have a better time with their higher memory read/write times and higher CPU speeds.

I have everything set to high with the exception of Trees (low for online play) and buildings which are on unlimited, However I have grass off (causes serious stutters) and Shadows off. This gives me solid mid 40’s FPS over towns and low 80’s most everywhere else. Shadows was what pulled my frames down, with shadows on and the same game setting I would get mid 20’s over towns and it would drop to high teens with other aircraft and flack. I am hoping with the optimization they are able to rectify some of these issues.

JD
AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz
ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler
Intel X25-M 160GB SSD
Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB
MSI R7970 OC
ATI Catalyst 12.3
KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W
COOLER MASTER HAF 932

MajorBoris
"Question: Do you forum more than you fly?"

raaaid
"i love it here makes me look normal"

Last edited by Jugdriver; 03-03-2012 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:16 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kankkis View Post
i'm big RoF fan, bought it right after release in russia(1 week), there was very much problems too. When was UK release(about half year after russia) it was better shape, but bugs there and there.
Which is not suprising really.. Most games are released with bugs.. It's just the nature of games.. What sets one game maker apart from another is how they support the game to address these bugs.. With that said, we are lucky that CoD is made by 1C and not the company that made Silent Hunter 5.. Both games were released with bugs, but, the makers of SH5 simply took the money and ran with it.. Where as 1C is still here working on it.. Yet reading some of the posts in this forum you would think 1C should be hung for doing so.. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:20 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DroopSnoot View Post
While i agree with you AoA, i also think that if your pc meets the specs then you shouldnt have to buy new hardware to play the game well.
There are two main parts to any PC..

1) The hardware (MB, MEM, Video Card, etc)
2) The software (OS, Drivers, etc).

With that said, you can have the newest hardware money can buy, but porly configured or conflicting software can make it run like a 286..

At the same time you can have old hardware, but, if your savvy enough, you can tweak the software to make that old hardware shine!

In short, hardware alone is not the answer! It is a combination!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 03-03-2012 at 05:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:24 PM
Kankkis Kankkis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
In short, hardware alone is not the answer
100% true.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.