![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes i agee, sometime in the near future im hoping the hardware will be developed that will allow us to use FSAA in a flightsim.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... ![]() |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
JSGME FXAA and SMAA utils
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have, about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... ![]() |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Furhter proof.. same game.. differnt PC.. different results
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buchon's MSAA worked well for me, look absolutely great sim now, i'll really enjoy flying it now, even more than RoF, and i'm big RoF fan, bought it right after release in russia(1 week), there was very much problems too. When was UK release(about half year after russia) it was better shape, but bugs there and there.
Last edited by Kankkis; 03-03-2012 at 04:00 PM. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While i agree with you AoA, i also think that if your pc meets the specs then you shouldnt have to buy new hardware to play the game well.
I will lol if all those who bought new hardware didnt need to with the correction made to the patch...but i dont have that much faith in the Devs ![]() |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is part of it, COD is not optimized for multi core CPU’s very well and it is still a very CPU dependent game. My card is only working at 30% but one of my CPU cores is working at 85% to 90% (the others are going at 20% to 30%). Over clocking gave me solid gains and I plan to push my CPU as close to 4Ghz as I can, but unless the developers are able to make COD take more advantage of other cores I think the Intel guys are going to have a better time with their higher memory read/write times and higher CPU speeds.
I have everything set to high with the exception of Trees (low for online play) and buildings which are on unlimited, However I have grass off (causes serious stutters) and Shadows off. This gives me solid mid 40’s FPS over towns and low 80’s most everywhere else. Shadows was what pulled my frames down, with shadows on and the same game setting I would get mid 20’s over towns and it would drop to high teens with other aircraft and flack. I am hoping with the optimization they are able to rectify some of these issues. JD AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler Intel X25-M 160GB SSD Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB MSI R7970 OC ATI Catalyst 12.3 KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W COOLER MASTER HAF 932 MajorBoris "Question: Do you forum more than you fly?" raaaid "i love it here makes me look normal" Last edited by Jugdriver; 03-03-2012 at 04:05 PM. |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Which is not suprising really.. Most games are released with bugs.. It's just the nature of games.. What sets one game maker apart from another is how they support the game to address these bugs.. With that said, we are lucky that CoD is made by 1C and not the company that made Silent Hunter 5.. Both games were released with bugs, but, the makers of SH5 simply took the money and ran with it.. Where as 1C is still here working on it.. Yet reading some of the posts in this forum you would think 1C should be hung for doing so.. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1) The hardware (MB, MEM, Video Card, etc) 2) The software (OS, Drivers, etc). With that said, you can have the newest hardware money can buy, but porly configured or conflicting software can make it run like a 286.. At the same time you can have old hardware, but, if your savvy enough, you can tweak the software to make that old hardware shine! In short, hardware alone is not the answer! It is a combination!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 03-03-2012 at 05:03 PM. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|