![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re the statement
The Germans were sinking British tankers at an increasing rate, and all 100 octane fuel was coming in those tankers....but this was increasingly uncertain as Uboot took their toll on the tankers, and, during May and June, until the French capitulation, with 25% of their fighters and some of their bombers running on 100 octane the British consumed 12 000 tons of 100 octane and 42 000 tons of other (87) grades, or 54 000 ton of avgas at total - and there was no tanker running in with 100 octane until August 1940. If there weren't any tankers coming in can someone explain how the reserves went up, in particular the 49,000 tons in the six weeks between 31st May and 11th July . I think we can rule out air freight or submarine cargo Stocks of 100 Octane 30th September 1939 153,000 tons(b) 27th February 1940 220,000 tons(b) 31st May 1940 294,000 tons(a) 11th July 1940 343,000 tons(b) 31st August 1940 404,000 tons(a) 10th October 1940 424,000 tons(c) 30th November 1940 440,000 tons(a) PS remember these are reserves total inports would have to cover usage as well |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(sorry, i can't resist
__________________
![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like it, it was an open goal
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh, and as for that Australian paper used so extensively by Barbi, here is its title, as used by Barbi as a reference in a Wikipedia article:
"Fuel Supplies to The British Empire And It's Commonwealth; Outlook, Ramifications and Projections For The Prosecution Of The War, February 1941, Australian War Memorial Archives." This came from: Revision as of 08:39, 16 July 2008 (edit) Kurfürst (talk | contribs) (Revised section on 100 octane fuel with more reliable and referenced information; noted fact that the German Air Force also used 100 octane fuel in the Battle. Better sectioning. Added armament info.) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...ldid=225978800 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ai...00_octane_fuel Barbi's explanation of the origins and importance of this paper: "The document which relealed the details of 100 octane use in the BoB by the RAF was a document, copied to the Australian Military Commission in England in February 1941, by Roll Royce to Lord Beaverbrook outlining past, current and proposed changes to the Merlin; and factors that affect it's performance. Its a British-made document, prepeared for the highest circles. McFarland, Pugh, Hart, Perret, Lumsden and even Churchill have all quoted parts from the report." Kurfürst (talk) 10:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Now, in 2008 I inquired of the AWM whether they had such a paper, giving this specific title, referencing Beaverbrook, Rolls-Royce, the Australian Military Commission etc etc...The AWM's response was that they had no such paper. Just googled, yahooed, binged "Australian Military Commission England WW2" nada - no such organisation appeared to even exist, but I'll cross reference with Australia's Official War Histories to see if there is mention of it there. I've also just submitted a search inquiry to the AWM: "I am making an inquiry as to whether the AWM Archives have a paper entitled: "Fuel Supplies to The British Empire And It's Commonwealth; Outlook, Ramifications and Projections For The Prosecution Of The War, February 1941' This was a paper written by Rolls-Royce and used by Lord Beaverbrook to address the supply of aviation fuel to Australia via the Australian Military Commission in Britain in February 1941. I am sorry that there appears to be no AWM reference number, so, hopefully, the title and key references will help." (Question # RCIS34105 Request type Reference Other Question ) I am sanguine that they will indeed find this paper and clear this matter up. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
wouldn't be the first time
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|