![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All i want is a lot of noobs to shoot and bomb.
![]() ![]()
__________________
---------------------------------------- Asus Sabertooth Z77 i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler. 8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600 Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD Seagate 750GB HDD CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45 Win7 64bit |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A well-built dynamic campaign. Scripted campaigns are for first-person-shooters.
Something that RB2 and TAW really got right. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Immersion.
Given that, there are many things that must be in place to create good immersion, realistic controls and behaviour of aircraft, good feeling flight model, radio traffic and more. Two IMO very important factors that are often overlooked are briefings and debriefings. To me a good briefing and debriefings system is very important to build up immersion for the mission at hand, and it should not just be a text to read but graphics too. You should feel like you're sitting in the briefing room having a map and perhaps photos of the targets and being given important information, this builds up suspense and goes a long way to giving the mission more meaning. The same with debriefing, it should be much more detailed and "alive" so that you really feel that you've contributed (or not if you failed) to the fighting. Realistic sims are great, but realism is only half the package to immersion, realism needs to be complemented with things that builds atmosphere or the sim will be all to sterile. What's the use of all that glorious realism if you don't get any incentive to go out there and fly missions? Last edited by yellonet; 02-25-2012 at 09:18 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|