Friday Update, January 27, 2012

Remember these , guys ?
Shown more than 2 years ago. always WIP, but was comfirmed by Oleg at that time that would be part of the first release. Now, 9 months after release, are we even close in terms of visual quality at playable FPS?
Whining is not pleasant, but at least give some room for expressing disapointement...And please stop saying that only a couple of features were not
implemented...Look at those pictures..There are many more like those that were " used" to promote the game....until the last minute before release...

Salute !

[skouras]

Originally Posted by kalimba

Remember these , guys ?
Shown more than 2 years ago. always WIP, but was comfirmed by Oleg at that time that would be part of the first release. Now, 9 months after release, are we even close in terms of visual quality at playable FPS?
Whining is not pleasant, but at least give some room for expressing disapointement...And please stop saying that only a couple of features were not
implemented...Look at those pictures..There are many more like those that were " used" to promote the game....until the last minute before release...

Salute !

AGREED
Nice shots by the way,,i wonder if will see this kind of beauty in our loved sim one day

[335th_GRAthos]

Originally Posted by kalimba

Remember these , guys ?
Shown more than 2 years ago. always WIP, but was comfirmed by Oleg at that time that would be part of the first release. Now, 9 months after release, are we even close in terms of visual quality at playable FPS?
Whining is not pleasant, but at least give some room for expressing disapointement...And please stop saying that only a couple of features were not
implemented...Look at those pictures..There are many more like those that were " used" to promote the game....until the last minute before release...

Salute !

I may be wrong but, the first release was very close to this (except for the fires pictured at the burning Blenheim).

The only problem then was that the fps was <10 and sli was not working.

I can not make 1c responsible for the low fps (says Athos while ducking for cover...), all this amazing graphic detail requires hardware ressources.
And finding new HW is easier (although costly) than finding new flight simulations

But I expect the bugs to be ironed out with priority.

~S~

[bongodriver]

And finding new HW is easier (although costly) than finding new flight simulations

N'uff said

[Flanker35M]

S!

So..basically. Luthier & Team should release a WELL documented SDK for CoD and oh boy would the community do something with it. Sure not all top notch, but I think the best of them would be VERY nice. Problem solved. Eh?

[jamesdietz]

Originally Posted by Flanker35M

S!

So..basically. Luthier & Team should release a WELL documented SDK for CoD and oh boy would the community do something with it. Sure not all top notch, but I think the best of them would be VERY nice. Problem solved. Eh?

Amen:
http://www.sas1946.com/main/index.ph...c,21274.0.html

[jamesdietz]

These were part of a preview some years ago...will it be in the upcoming release?





+ others ...?

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by jamesdietz

These were part of a preview some years ago...will it be in the upcoming release?





+ others ...?

Arent those original IL2 sreeens....nothing to do with COD (at least the torpedo bomber)

[Kupsised]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

Arent those original IL2 sreeens....nothing to do with COD (at least the torpedo bomber)

As I remember it, torpedo bomber is Il2, biplane I believe (although could be wrong) was one of the shown models from Luthier's Korean expansion.

[dcart]

1 @ Zapatista
Friends you have a short memory ...
Remember displays attractive and the comments of Mr. Oleg Maddox preceding the publication of the DCO. One of the best disinformation business operations (admiration!) but also a series of half-truths built on sand ... To believe in the reassuring words of Mr. Luthier ... Sorry, but a doubt has interfered.
Accepted by some, denied by others, we must admit that the quality and especially the finish is not here. The seriousness was, however, until now, the trademark of the studios of Mr. Maddox.
I don't condemn, and I don't judge the attitude of Mr. Luthier - the man has his reasons which I don't want to know - but I am surprised to see some of you, friends, complain about him and bring him support and encouragement. Wake up guys, they are business people first, then policies (promises, promises ...). A dream goes ...