Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2012, 02:50 PM
lanling lanling is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Default

Chinese

新版的IL 2 COD moscow 一定要放弃与老的IL2COD完全不兼容。

新版的IL2 COD MOSCOW 必须是64位的游戏

核心引挚必须重写不能与老的IL2COD一 。

图像引挚必须要与NVIDIA和AMD密切合作

新版的IL2 COD MOSCOW 必须支持 多核CPU

图像引挚必须支持 CrossFire 和 SLI 技术

老的IL2 COD 里面的 飞机建模, 火车建模、弹道、

爆炸效果,可以移入到IL2 COD MOSCOW



New version of IL 2 COD moscow must give up the old IL2COD completely incompatible.

New version of IL2 COD MOSCOW must be 64-bit games

Must rewrite the core engine is deliberately not the same as with the old IL2COD.

Images must be cited loved working closely with NVIDIA and AMD.

New version of IL2 COD MOSCOW must support multi-core CPU

Image engine is deliberately to support CrossFire and SLI technology

Inside the old IL2 COD aircraft modeling, model trains, ballistic,

Explosions, can be moved to the IL2 COD MOSCOW
  #2  
Old 02-01-2012, 09:04 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

guys in the white coats....where are you when we need you?
  #3  
Old 02-02-2012, 08:27 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

So true Tvrdi But again no hardware will run a bad code no matter how you tweak it. Sometimes it feels that in these days of console porting being THE thing and coder relying on hardware getting stronger is a reason why we get crap codes that are buggy. I can be totally wrong, but why should a sloppy coder bother with optimizing his code when he can think that let the hardware crunch it. I bet not even today with all the high end hardware around their full potential is even used...
  #4  
Old 02-02-2012, 08:50 AM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

So true Tvrdi But again no hardware will run a bad code no matter how you tweak it. Sometimes it feels that in these days of console porting being THE thing and coder relying on hardware getting stronger is a reason why we get crap codes that are buggy. I can be totally wrong, but why should a sloppy coder bother with optimizing his code when he can think that let the hardware crunch it. I bet not even today with all the high end hardware around their full potential is even used...
+1. Sad but true.
  #5  
Old 02-02-2012, 05:29 PM
tota tota is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Default

As someone who is coding this really sets me up.
I think you simply cannot compare - 40 years ago you perhaps had the time to tweak and optimize a small piece of code, and working hard you could perhaps achieve a perfect, but very small tool.
The code base of Cod however must be HUGE, most of the work probably gets into just getting all the mess somehow organized, and it would take unimpossible amounts of manpower to do everything perfect. Complexity is the problem,not lazy or sloppy coders.... its just plain insulting to insinuate they would not care because of the available hardware.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.