Who else is suffering F5itis?

[fruitbat]

Originally Posted by Tropical Storm

I found a rather easy and nice way to play IL-2 widescreen on my notebook, but I don't know if it is possible for everyone or if Im saying something that everybody already knows, but anyway...

I have a Geforce graphic card, so I just go to the NVIDIA control panel (by right clicking on the desktop), select "adjust desktop size and position" and, under the "scaling mode", select "full screen"... and when I start IL-2, voilá! Nice and smooth widescreen withou changing anything on the config.ini...

Thanks again TD for all your hard work and your concern in delivering us a bug-free patch, we have waited many months, we can wait a few more days or weeks!

yes, but your loosing FOV......

what your doing has been known for years, but doesn't address the problem.

[Treetop64]

Finding late, show-stopping bugs in beta testing is no uncommon occurrence. Glad to know your guys are on top of things. Looking forward to release.

[harryRIEDL]

Would I be too hopeful to ask if we have a new date to look forward to this great release

[AndyJWest]

Originally Posted by harryRIEDL

Would I be too hopeful to ask if we have a new date to look forward to this great release

The new date is the same as the previous one - it'll be released when it's ready...

[stugumby]

Not the dreaded distortive harmonic vibration in the shaft balancing flux capacitor linkage coupling. Hence causing clutter in the thermal processing unit relay, causing the plasma to cool early???

[AndyJWest]

Originally Posted by stugumby

Not the dreaded distortive harmonic vibration in the shaft balancing flux capacitor linkage coupling. Hence causing clutter in the thermal processing unit relay, causing the plasma to cool early???

No. They fixed that earlier. The problem is that their fix misaligned the magnetohydrodynamic oscillators, leading to a feedback loop in the negative-polarity quantum-field link. Or more likely it was a stray null pointer, a fencepost error, or an attempt to test a floating-point number for equality with '0.10'...

Most bugs are annoyingly obvious... after you find them...

[_1SMV_Gitano]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

No. They fixed that earlier. The problem is that their fix misaligned the magnetohydrodynamic oscillators, leading to a feedback loop in the negative-polarity quantum-field link. Or more likely it was a stray null pointer, a fencepost error, or an attempt to test a floating-point number for equality with '0.10'...

Most bugs are annoyingly obvious... after you find them...

Faster-than-light neutrinos and Higgs bosons are modelled as well. Some of you may claim that neutrinos are overmodelled...