Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:25 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Some people also need to learn to be able to tell the difference between right/wrong and having an opinion that deviates from their own and also respect that opinion without telling them that they are wrong or try to convince others that their own opinions are the only "correct" ones. I know, it's a lot to ask for from some people.
__________________
  #2  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:26 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Now now now.. dont be too hard on yourself!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #3  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:30 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
Some people also need to learn to be able to tell the difference between right/wrong and having an opinion that deviates from their own and also respect that opinion without telling them that they are wrong or try to convince others that their own opinions are the only "correct" ones. I know, it's a lot to ask for from some people.
Not really. When Luthier announces that the business model for CoD is going to be the same as IL2, and people who like the IL2 business model are complaining, the problem is not a difference of opinion.
  #4  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:30 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

That is a good point.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #5  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:38 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
Not really. When Luthier announces that the business model for CoD is going to be the same as IL2, and people who like the IL2 business model are complaining, the problem is not a difference of opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
That is a good point.
Wow! it's like talking with a puppet master and his puppet, anywho, people have the right to complain and people have the right to object to those complaints but I don't think it's fair to make it seem as if others opinion in a matter -business model as an example in this case I guess- is totally wrong or totally right either. They are opinions guys, they are not universal truths, they are not concrete. Please tell me I'm not talking to a wall here, show me a sign of understanding.
__________________
  #6  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:40 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
They are opinions guys
No, it isn't. Luthier said the model will be the same. That isn't opinion, that is FACT.
  #7  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:41 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
No, it isn't. Luthier said the model will be the same. That isn't opinion, that is FACT.
It's not fact until it has happened mate.
__________________
  #8  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:59 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
It's not fact until it has happened mate.
No, it's definitely a fact that he said it. Whether or not they'll actually do it is pointless speculation. My useless speculation is based on past history and common sense. Your useless speculation is based on relentless negativity.
  #9  
Old 12-24-2011, 11:12 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

2. Will you reenable cockpit shake that existed in the earlier versions?
Quote:
We actually removed it because the fans requested it.

I hope this is a mistake and will be brought back. Seems crazy not to have it. High G turns, dives are much more fun in IL-2 because of it right?

Last edited by Richie; 12-24-2011 at 11:15 PM.
  #10  
Old 12-24-2011, 07:41 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
Please tell me I'm not talking to a wall here, show me a sign of understanding.
ditto
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.