|
|
|
|
#1
12-12-2011, 01:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
To put it in musical terms, comparing the Il-2 era Maddox Games to the present company lineup is like comparing Jefferson Airplane with Jefferson Starship.
|
|
#2
12-12-2011, 02:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
12-12-2011, 02:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
|
|
#4
12-12-2011, 02:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
12-12-2011, 04:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it's a good plan by Luthier's crew- getting back to the Eastern Front is where their heart is. We in the West have view of WW2 that is quite different to the Eastern Bloc countries- it's not even referred to by them as WW2, but rather the 'Great Patriotic War'.
CoD was a buggy mess on release that still remains far from perfect, but i see more and more people regularly getting online on the ATAG server so we can get decent confrontations happening with larger numbers of planes. I see the problems but i'm thoroughly enjoying this game and can't wait until they create a new map with new planes etc. I believe the CoD guys were too ambitious- the complex weather model etc was too demanding and distracted them from core things like Comms and refining flight models. There is so much potential lurking beneath these annoyances that i hope these guys do move ahead and make a fresh start with the Battle of Moscow- it'll go well in their home market and allow them to use the lessons learned from CoD to make a much more polished game.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
