|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
02-27-2008, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
 ... sorrySure, i don't know if this plane must be created for SOW...So, it must have datas to create something...but now still nothing ... is it clear for all? lol we are all waiting the informations from 1C and Oleg Maddox ... Last edited by FAW_SAUMON; 02-27-2008 at 07:52 PM. 
|
|
#2
02-28-2008, 11:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I don't mind the Amiot beeing created, but if the LeO 451 or the Breguet 693 are created also, I prefer one of them flyable in priority to the Amiot.
It's too slow ! We don't need another TB3.
|
|
#3
02-28-2008, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Of course, Leo 45 and Bréguet 693 are priorities !! Leo 45 :  Bréguet 693 :  
|
|
#4
02-29-2008, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Saumon
A few suggestions. The level of detail required for models in SoW will be very high. 1. Engine details. You need detailed drawings of engine layouts, mountings and ancillary components including oil and fuel tank layouts etc. Some engines were used on numerous different aircraft so a bit of research here is useful for more than one model if you research the commonly used types. 2. Airframes. You need internal details of the aircraft structure. 3D cutaway drawings or manufacturing photos or similar. Photos of crash sites often show a lot of structural detail not normally seen. 3. Cockpit details. Good internal photos of each crew position. Better to focus on one aircraft type and get lots of detail rather than covering lots of types with little detail. I would love to see some French aircraft models created, not just for BoF but also Syria and Tunisia and retaliation raids on Gibraltar etc.
|
|
#5
02-29-2008, 12:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
actually , i belive the grade of detail you choose/modell in the 3.party part - can be very low
|
|
#6
02-29-2008, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know much about 3D modelling, but there is definitely a window of LOD's and polygons that are "acceptable" for any given application. The BOB:SOW models will assuredly be more detailed than what we're currently used to, but going overboard on the polys could make the addition of a particular model as unlikely as not having enough.
If there are modelers interested and talented enough, I'd say they should get cracking straight away. There were a number of aircraft NOT included into IL2:1946 because the 3D models got to 1:C too late for them to do the hard part...coding the FM's. Some giudeline criteria from 1:C would be of great help obviously.
|
|
#7
02-29-2008, 02:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I wonder where did you get this information? I may be mistaken but I do not remember having read any definitive statement from OM about this... I hope that if someone is willing and able to do as good or even possibly a better job of making the 3D-model, the associated DM and FM of a particular plane, by all means let him do it and provide him with the needed tools or at least the needed specifications... If one does not want to wait for too long after release of SoW-BoB the first proposals of value, it would really be time to give some tech info for the interested parties to begin work! I have a very hard time to understand why it has not been done yet? Visibly these specs are known to a large degree since quite some time: the 3D images of the Spit cockpit or the wire-3D-DM of the 109 have appeared almost 2 years ago... Unless of course if giving away some information like max allowed number of polygons outside and inside, number and detail level of LOD, requested info and its level of detail for creating the inertia, DM and FM parameters will give competition a pretty good estimate of what the engine will be capable of? And what would happen then? Is it a real good excuse to stay silent? Questions, questions... JV
|
|
#8
07-23-2009, 01:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Missed a line...
Does BoF in progress of creating? Or not?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
