Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2011, 09:27 AM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

I have my 920 at 3.8 Ghz
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2011, 03:52 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Taking this into consideration it seems to be more like a problem of the ineffective utilisation of multi cores..... so the game benefits mainly from the oc of the first core and minor from the other 3 i guess.

further enhancements of the multi core utilisation would equilize the benfits of overclocking i suppose... as soon as dynamic weather and maybe AI are transfered to the other cores.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-22-2011, 04:05 AM
AKA_Tenn AKA_Tenn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 213
Default

i think how this game works is more like... it uses 1 core as the main one, and offloads smaller tasks to the other cores, that way if you only have a two cores, it can offload multiple tasks to the second core without bogging it down... games are still not truly multi-threaded yet

Last edited by AKA_Tenn; 11-22-2011 at 04:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2011, 02:58 AM
l3uLLDoZeR l3uLLDoZeR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 113
Default

To answer your question, YES overclocking your cpu makes a huge difference in this game. I don't think the number of cores matters as much as speed, so overclocking is the way to go.

I had an e8400 overclocked to 3.6ghz and it ran the game pretty well.
Now I have a i2500K @ 4.5 ghz ....so 2 extra cores and a higher overclock. I gained about 15fps and got to turn a few setting from medium to high, but nothing drastic.

Whatever cpu you have it's worth overclocking as long as you have good cooling in your case and for the cpu. Don't crank anything with a stock cooler!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2011, 03:03 AM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Shameless plug for my Zallman CPU fan. Keeps the i7 2600K cool at 4.4ghz. Even with CoD maxed out ASUS monitor has never registered the CPU temp higher than 51*
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2011, 01:53 AM
FS~Phat FS~Phat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default

Going above 4.2Ghz is diminishing returns as you become more dependant on GPU. I cant wait to see what the next overhauled beta does, they are promising a minimum 50% performance increase from rewriting the core/graphics engine.

I have 4way SLI that is going to waste at the moment with this game as it doesnt even support 2way SLI! None of the SLI workarounds make any difference with 4way SLI for me so hopefully I can get back close to the performance I was getting with 4way Xfire which was 200FPS+ compared to 60FPS with SLI not working
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:57 AM
cronustr cronustr is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4
Default

I have a laptop with i5-2430m 2.4ghz cpu and Nvidia GT540m with 2MB gpu. I'm overcloking the gpu from the stock 672Mhz to 800Mhz and memory from stock 800Mhz to 1000Mhz. System is %100 stable, gpu is at 74C maximum and performance gain is very good. I'm using native resolution of 1366*768 with grass, shadows off, roads detail off, buildings detail low, forests ver low before and barely playable at crowded air wars. But now it's quite smooth with these settings.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2011, 02:02 PM
ATAG_Septic ATAG_Septic is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qpassa View Post
I have my 920 at 3.8 Ghz
I run my 930 at 4.2 stable and cool, water-cooled. I might not be quite so adventurous with different motherboard etc.

Thanks very much for sharing your results Cheesehawk, I've often wondered whether it's a benefit to Clod but don't have the patience to do scientific tests (I always seem to end up changing more than one setting between tests!)

Last edited by ATAG_Septic; 11-25-2011 at 02:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2011, 01:29 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Are some technical details of the new Ivy Bridges allready known? Like how many cores and with which initial ghz they run? Any Price speculations?
I just found very general informations about it, but nothing more...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.