![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Interesting.. So let me see if I understand you correctly.. Your saying that up to now, the STEAM software has been causing CoD to stutter and run 10fps slower than it should.. So far so good? And that we are to belive (1) 1C did NOT notice CoD shuddering and running 10fps slower via STEAM than without STEAM. OR (2) 1C did notice CoD shuddering and running 10fps slower via STEAM, but did not say anything about it before the patch, let alone say anything after the patch. Which is it? Either one just seems odd to me.. but that is your opinion and your welcome to it! I just hope your open minded enough to 'allow' others to express their opinions, and even disagree with yours.. Without you having to continue to resort to personal attacks.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
"The game don't runs better now in your computer". Because THIS is "personal attack" and plain stupidity and lack of respect. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Well than I guess it is a good thing that no one has said the game does not run better now on your computer Quote:
If you would like, I can proivde you some examples from your previous post to me and others that IMHO qualify as 'personal attacks'. Let me know if you think that would help, in that I would be glad to do that for you!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 09-03-2011 at 02:21 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C'mon guys. Lets bring this dead horse to page 10.
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe it is just me..
But I always thought the purpose of a forum was to provide the user a place to exchange information and ideas.. Right? Assuming that is the case.. I don't think anyone should expect their claims of FACT on any subject to be the last word on the subject.. Right? I mean if your going to come into a forum (as define by me above) shouldn't it be expected that others may be prone to ask questions wrt to the statements of FACT this or FACT that? Right? So, knowing in advance one should expect questions as to how they came to their conclusions of FACT. I think they should not post at all if they are going to be so offended by questions that they have to resort to personal attacks Am I crazy to expect that? Is that too much to ask?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"I've paid my five quid and I'm here for an argument."
"No, you haven't........"
__________________
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally, I prefer my pancakes with bacon. Or my rabbit with carrots.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Valid questions ACE-OF-ACES.
I think the new "disagree with me and you're my enemy for life" of Internet-laws has some inmpact on the issue. ![]() Very common in here. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|