What a tracer should look like (before spazzing just look).

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by kalimba

Ok...My last post
That is very strange when so many RL experienced posters still have very different opinions regarding COD's tracers...

SAlute !

that's probably because of lot of them have no real life experience except for hollywood... and believe just sounding knowledgeable makes it a fact

[Sternjaeger II]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

that's probably because of lot of them have no real life experience except for hollywood... and believe just sounding knowledgeable makes it a fact

..how is this post supposed to help exactly? Is there any need for this flaming?

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

that's probably because of lot of them have no real life experience except for hollywood... and believe just sounding knowledgeable makes it a fact

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

With all due respect,I think people could express an opinion on this matter ONLY if they saw tracers in real life. Lying about it is just silly and counterproductive me thinks.

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

..how is this post supposed to help exactly? Is there any need for this flaming?

.

[choctaw111]

I stumbled upon this vid today. It shows tracers during the day and at night from the same vantage point on a LAV.
The cameraman pans around during the shooting and I believe this give the best impression yet of what tracers really do look like as the camera seems to record very close to what the human eye sees or at least what my eyes have seen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypsee...feature=relmfu

[steppie]

I one you all for get is that all of the modern weapon that are shot are showing shots that are over 1500m or more were in the game most shot are only 300m to 500m so they look a lot faster, also tracer and incendiary round in modern armament is a lot different to what was in 1942 and they burn brighter and longer.


Here footage from spit in ww2 and you ahev trouble seeing the tracer rounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv8rFPLN_Fg

this one from P51 and you don't see a lot of trcer rounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjr8Z...eature=related

Originally Posted by choctaw111

I stumbled upon this vid today. It shows tracers during the day and at night from the same vantage point on a LAV.
The cameraman pans around during the shooting and I believe this give the best impression yet of what tracers really do look like as the camera seems to record very close to what the human eye sees or at least what my eyes have seen.

Gimme THAT in COD , with a faint smoke trail and I will be VERY happy...!

Salute !

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by choctaw111

I stumbled upon this vid today. It shows tracers during the day and at night from the same vantage point on a LAV.
The cameraman pans around during the shooting and I believe this give the best impression yet of what tracers really do look like as the camera seems to record very close to what the human eye sees or at least what my eyes have seen.

Thats pretty accurate, the only exception being that they look a tiny bit wider in the footage than I think they should be on a .50, but as you note they are still thinner then in game. Also in rl they are slightly narrower but more intense, but as you can see in the footage the tracer becomes shorter as it moves away from you, it will also be shorter the further you are from it in distance at a 90 degree angle.

[Sternjaeger II]

Originally Posted by Heliocon

Thats pretty accurate, the only exception being that they look a tiny bit wider in the footage than I think they should be on a .50, but as you note they are still thinner then in game. Also in rl they are slightly narrower but more intense, but as you can see in the footage the tracer becomes shorter as it moves away from you, it will also be shorter the further you are from it in distance at a 90 degree angle.

oh for the love of god... that's not a .50cal, that's a 7.62 one, the .50 cal is in the end.

Another thing that "experts" don't probably know is that nowadays there are three kinds of tracers: bright, semi-bright and dim.

Once again, please bear in mind the RAF standard order of the era:

"Browning 303s fire 1200 rounds per minute, that's 20 per second. As mentioned above, what you see also depends on the number of tracers loaded. If you have a tracer every 5 rounds then that's 4 tracers streaking away every second."

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II

oh for the love of god... that's not a .50cal, that's a 7.62 one, the .50 cal is in the end.

Another thing that "experts" don't probably know is that nowadays there are three kinds of tracers: bright, semi-bright and dim.

Once again, please bear in mind the RAF standard order of the era:

"Browning 303s fire 1200 rounds per minute, that's 20 per second. As mentioned above, what you see also depends on the number of tracers loaded. If you have a tracer every 5 rounds then that's 4 tracers streaking away every second."

Mr genius I was talking about the .50 cal at the end, not the APC gun ffs. As for your other comments, are you talking to yourself? I never commented on that, I am only comparing them to what I have seen once in RL. But I am sure you were there in 1940 to compare the tracers right?