Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2011, 04:32 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Because they can, "they" have always been here, and they love the game really, i feel its frustration. I agree with both sides of the fence in all honesty all joking aside, Sorry car guy just messing around.

Last edited by BigPickle; 07-11-2011 at 04:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2011, 04:43 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
Because they can, "they" have always been here, and they love the game really, i feel its frustration. I agree with both sides of the fence in all honesty all joking aside, Sorry car guy just messing around.

I'm going to refer you to my last post in this thread.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...=24431&page=10

Think before posting please, your manner starts threads off in the wrong direction with your "not thinking" before posting attitude.

You are not the only one guilty of this but you seem not to have learned much during your time here.

Same old stuff..........
.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2011, 04:49 PM
Crane
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Have the moderators gone all school teacher on us here? Or is it just Alpha who's taking his job a little too seriously?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2011, 04:51 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crane View Post
Have the moderators gone all school teacher on us here? Or is it just Alpha who's taking his job a little too seriously?

Go read the rules then come back here and post something of use.

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 07-11-2011 at 04:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2011, 05:01 PM
Crane
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
Go read the rules then come back here and post something of use.
Doffs cap to the mighty moderator!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2011, 05:10 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

This thread has potential but unfortunately shows all the signs of becoming another flame fest.

Anyway, yes I think so far so good. The MP sound issue is the most critical of fixes at the moment, but we have been told to wait a few months for a complete rewriting of the code. Perhaps this is the best way.
Nobody knows the game code better than the devs, and if they think it neccessitates a complete overhaul, then there must be a good reason for it.
Frustrating for the online gamers for sure, but let's hope the wait will be worth it.
I'd like to see how this thread develops in the coming months.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2011, 05:12 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Really i think making fullscreen through-out the game is the most critical, but definately the MP sound bug is a killer.

By the way is it just ATI that still has the crazy flashing of desktop or does Nvidia have it too?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2011, 05:00 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Alpha, I think it's pretty obvious that a large portion of members don't think before posting, given the bans which are being handed around for either swearing or quoting posts with swear-words in them. It's one way of showing how not to run a forum (especially given that I could search your past posts for swear-words with results; so yes, you are a hypocrite).

@Bongo; the reason why they are still posting is because they want the game to succeed; isn't it obvious? If everyone was a devoted 'fan-boi' there would be no constructuve criticism, so the devs would be lulled into a situation where they thought that everyone was happy with the sim. Most poeple aren't happy with the sim; they're just content with the possiblity that the sim could become something great (if pushed in the right direction).
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Luthier himself has advocated constructive criticism. The only times that criticsm breaks down and becomes de-constructive is when there is a major silence from the devs, indicating that they are either unaware of the community, or immune to it. I doubt both of these examples are true, but people won't stop being 'negative' until there is official word on all areas of the sim under the spotlight.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2011, 05:08 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
Alpha, I think it's pretty obvious that a large portion of members don't think before posting, given the bans which are being handed around for either swearing or quoting posts with swear-words in them. It's one way of showing how not to run a forum (especially given that I could search your past posts for swear-words with results; so yes, you are a hypocrite).

@Bongo; the reason why they are still posting is because they want the game to succeed; isn't it obvious? If everyone was a devoted 'fan-boi' there would be no constructuve criticism, so the devs would be lulled into a situation where they thought that everyone was happy with the sim. Most poeple aren't happy with the sim; they're just content with the possiblity that the sim could become something great (if pushed in the right direction).
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Luthier himself has advocated constructive criticism. The only times that criticsm breaks down and becomes de-constructive is when there is a major silence from the devs, indicating that they are either unaware of the community, or immune to it. I doubt both of these examples are true, but people won't stop being 'negative' until there is official word on all areas of the sim under the spotlight.
Phil,

I understand the concept of criticism and how fanboi'ism will not help, but the criticism is becoming a stuck record, and I don't think a constant barrage of DCS is better or ROF is better will help the sim suceed, rather it will make people go and buy DCS and ROF and forget COD......no? but how about this for a concept, every aspect of the games bugginess has now been discussed to death, and there have been sadly only a couple of threads that really go into highlighting the bugs, the rest is just mud slinging, this is why I see no logic to the current form of criticism....it just wont help the sim suceed at all.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition

Last edited by bongodriver; 07-11-2011 at 05:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2011, 03:00 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Regarding behaviour: There are all sorts of ways of giving 'constructive criticism'. If the critics on this forum acted the same when they were giving constructive criticism when their steak was under cooked or their cappuccino was a little cold, I'm 100% sure that it would come back with excess of the normal allowance of e-coli or human spittle!

The roadmap: according to Luthiers’ roadmap, we're fairly well on track. Hope they get the multiplayer sound issues cracked ahead of schedule.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.