Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:22 PM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Bullpoop!


My 2 GB Radeon 6970 scores 6.4, and a 1280 MB Nvidia 470 scores 7.8? I think not. It doesn't seem to take into account overclocking, or much else besides - it doesn't even seem to differentiate between 69xx series cards. I sincerely hope that nobody takes this seriously.
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2.
OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung.
Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:36 PM
AARPRazorbacks AARPRazorbacks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SEC, USA. WPS
Posts: 222
Default

Thank for posting your results.

What HDD do you have?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2011, 12:11 AM
LT.INSTG8R LT.INSTG8R is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 36
Default

As you can see by your 2 different results that is a VERY useless test of pc performance. Not to be taken seriously at all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2011, 12:12 AM
jg27_mc jg27_mc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Porto Santo Island, Portugal
Posts: 249
Default

Here is mine:



Check my signature for full hardware specs and overclock.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:00 AM
AARPRazorbacks AARPRazorbacks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SEC, USA. WPS
Posts: 222
Default

My base score is 5.9. That means no matter how good the other hardware score is, my PC will only run programs with a 5.9 or lower rating.

I'm able to run CLoD at good FPS with this Base score.

So if anyone that test there PC with this and have a 5.9 or above base score and say thy are having trouble running CLoD IT"S NOT YOUR HARDWARE.



What is the Windows Experience Index?

The Windows Experience Index measures the capability of your computer's hardware and software configuration and expresses this measurement as a number called a base score. A higher base score generally means that your computer will perform better and faster than a computer with a lower base score, especially when performing more advanced and resource-intensive tasks.

Each hardware component receives an individual subscore. Your computer's base score is determined by the lowest subscore. For example, if the lowest subscore of an individual hardware component is 2.6, then the base score is 2.6. The base score is not an average of the combined subscores. However, the subscores can give you a view of how the components that are most important to you will perform, and can help you decide which components to upgrade.

You can use the base score to buy programs and other software that are matched to your computer's base score. For example, if your computer has a base score of 3.3, then you can buy any software designed for this version of Windows that requires a computer with a base score of 3 or lower.

The scores currently range from 1.0 to 7.9. The Windows Experience Index is designed to accommodate advances in computer technology. As hardware speed and performance improve, higher score ranges will be enabled. The standards for each level of the index generally stay the same. However, in some cases, new tests might be developed that can result in lower scores.

Note

If your computer has a 64-bit central processing unit (CPU) and 4 gigabytes (GB) or less random access memory (RAM), then the Memory (RAM) subscore for your computer will have a maximum of 5.9.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:10 AM
Thee_oddball Thee_oddball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 812
Default





S!
__________________
Gigabyte Z68
Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler
8GB Ram
EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram
CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W
64 GB SSD SATA II HD
WIN7 UL 64BIT
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:22 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Sorry, but I still say it is bullpoop. You cannot make a definitive statement on what will or will not run based on crude figures like this. There are generally game-specific recommendations (as for CloD), and they will be much more relevant.

(to answer your question, I have a 128 GB CRUCIAL SSD, and a I TB Western Digital Caviar Green Sata 2 HDD -of course, performance may depend on what is installed where)
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2.
OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung.
Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2011, 02:15 AM
AARPRazorbacks AARPRazorbacks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SEC, USA. WPS
Posts: 222
Default

(to answer your question, I have a 128 GB CRUCIAL SSD, and a I TB Western Digital Caviar Green Sata 2 HDD -of course, performance may depend on what is installed where)[/QUOTE]


Good to see you score high with the 128 GB CRUCIAL SSD. I'm putting in a Crucial M4 CT064M4SSD2 2.5" 64GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive when it gets here Monday or the next day.
The only thing I'm putting on this SSD is W-7, CLoD and RoF.
This should make W-7 much faster because W-7 was set-up to run on SDD's
as is CLoD and RoF.

I say CloD is set-up to run on SDD's because W-7 is. And for CLoD to run it's best is on W-7 64 bit.

Last edited by AARPRazorbacks; 06-27-2011 at 04:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2011, 02:49 AM
White Owl White Owl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 225
Default

When I was first considering getting a solid state drive, I did some googling and came across an article that explained in great detail how the Windows experience index is perfectly useless for evaluating SSDs, since the index uses the drive's rotation speed as an important criteria. And of course a SSD doesn't have a rotation speed. So with that bit of information missing, all the other numbers are garbage.

I don't have the link anymore, and don't recall where I found it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-27-2011, 01:08 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg27_mc View Post
Here is mine:

Check my signature for full hardware specs and overclock.

Cheers.
Considering it's on a score of 1 to 7.9 your system scores very high in almost all areas.

I don't know why you'd get a low score for your Disk drive. Even though it's a small partition it's over 25% free. (obviously you using that partition for the OS and not much else.) I wonder how they work out that score?


Cheers!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.