Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:33 PM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

I agree that the 16:10 appropriate FOV is close to 100.

Im using a 1920x1200 (24 inches) monitor, and the game looks better around FOV 95, I guess FOV 100 is correct for 27 inches.

in game I have to set 90 FOV and then adjust the fov pressing the FOV´s key and using the vertical mouse axis.

This method is not precise and is very annoying that I have to do this every time that the game is started.

I miss a method to set my desired FOV by default
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:50 PM
Kianoni Kianoni is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 56
Default

field of view and image size are 2 different things - it really would be nice if we would be able to set these up correctly for different type of screen setups.
the quote from the manual might be correct for a 19" 4:3 screen but with anything different from that it's pure bullshit.
take a 64" 16:9 screen and run the game with it's default image size and field of view - this would be far from what a real pilot sees.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:51 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TBH the distortion doesnt bother me that much. its situational awareness i care off and the fact that i can move my eyes independant of my head But the sim is simulating my eyes statically looking ahead at its apparent most realistic settings.

i guess what the real ball ache is that TIR acts as my eyes really not my head. i believe what i want simulated is the full range of the eye scan left right up down etc etc on my screen. with me ? the more you increase Fov. the more it seems to simulate the head aspect. we have the choice which is good i guess. mega montior setup seems to be the only way to get around this and even that is flawed.

Last edited by Ali Fish; 04-28-2011 at 06:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2011, 11:21 AM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Agree.

I did this in my 1920x1200 monitor :

Increased the FOV, around 95, then increased the zoom forward to fix the pilot position.

Obtaining with this an awesome situational awareness position , in fact is how the game should look in 16:10

We need a line in the config.ini to set our desire default FOV and our desire default zoom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2011, 12:14 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buchon View Post
Agree.

I did this in my 1920x1200 monitor :

Increased the FOV, around 95, then increased the zoom forward to fix the pilot position.

Obtaining with this an awesome situational awareness position , in fact is how the game should look in 16:10

We need a line in the config.ini to set our desire default FOV and our desire default zoom

+1

choice is what its all about.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2011, 03:28 PM
CharveL CharveL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 366
Default

Your issue is simply a TIR profile not suited to your particular situation. Specifically the Pitch axis is not sensitive enough resulting in you having to move your head much too far to see the control panel.

If you search my posts you'll find my profile which you can use as a basis for your own preferences and sitting situation (distance from clip to receiver) by adding or subtracting overall sensitivity.

My profile is fairly aggressive with just enough deadzone to make aiming easy enough while not "pulling" too much when you need to look up or out the side. Most people at first require a larger deadzone to stay "locked-in" to the sights but eventually you'll want the quick and responsive movement for tracking planes so you might prefer a bit less sensitivity.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2011, 04:17 PM
Kianoni Kianoni is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 56
Default

the issue being discussed here is about a realistic FOV settings for different screen sizes - NOT about TIR profiles.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2011, 04:29 PM
CharveL CharveL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kianoni View Post
the issue being discussed here is about a realistic FOV settings for different screen sizes - NOT about TIR profiles.
Yeah, I got that and am responding to his also mentioned issue that the 30deg setting is not good enough because his eyes have to strain to look up while trying to look at the dashboard.

Is that ok with you, sparky?

Last edited by CharveL; 05-02-2011 at 04:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.