Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2011, 02:28 AM
patrat1 patrat1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

i spent some time testing using the black death track. latest beta, all game settings maxxed except no ssao or v sync. note: i dont get tearing with v sync off, so i see no reason to use it.

1st i ran it at my cpu stock setting of 3.7 ghz, then i ran it with a OC at 4.5 ghz.

my results were no change in my minimum fps, both runs were 18 fps and my average using the OC was only 2 fps higher than no OC, 68 vs 66 fps.

this pretty much confirms that COD doesnt use all the available cpu power to its greatest extent and that throwing more ghz at it won't get you anywhere, at least not at this point in time.

my system

I5 2500k
asus p8p67 deluxe
gtx 570 super OC
8 gigs 1600 ram

Last edited by patrat1; 04-24-2011 at 02:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2011, 04:35 AM
Srinidhalaya Srinidhalaya is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
5.2GHz on air is an extreme case


They easily overclock to 5.2 with air cooling alone, and in this set up there isn't even any extra cooling fans. I've read further into the matter while building my computer and from what I can tell it's really stable, especially compared to previous setups due to the new EFI BIOS. The asus motherboards with EFI go one step further and if set on "auto" mode they will back off if it senses problems, WHILE windows is running live.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2011, 03:24 PM
squidgyb's Avatar
squidgyb squidgyb is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Srinidhalaya View Post
[url]They easily overclock to 5.2 with air cooling alone, and in this set up there isn't even any extra cooling fans.
Well colour me impressed.

Still, ~£280 for the motherboard, £220 for the cpu... How do I explain this one to the missus?

e: notwithstanding the point patrat made though - unless we get more significant optimisations in the code, it's probable that ~1.2Ghz on top of what I have now wouldn't make any difference in any case
__________________
Core I7 920 @ 4.2GHz
Asus P6X58D-E
G.Skill 24 GB DDR3 RAM 1600
GeForce GTX 580 3Gb
Win 7 Ultimate 64bit
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2011, 03:32 PM
Srinidhalaya Srinidhalaya is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
that ~1.2Ghz on top of what I have now wouldn't make any difference in any case
Nope

EDIT: Just watch the black death, my lowest FPS according to fraps was 39fps during the twist and turn over the small city, while in exterior view moving mouse look.

Last edited by Srinidhalaya; 04-24-2011 at 03:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2011, 05:57 PM
patrat1 patrat1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

your saying your minium fps while running the black death track is 39fps? whats your average if i may ask? also what do you mean by "moving mouse look", arent you just running the track as it is, and letting fraps record your fps?

anyway thats dam good. is that with maxxed settings also?

Last edited by patrat1; 04-24-2011 at 06:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2011, 07:55 PM
squidgyb's Avatar
squidgyb squidgyb is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 71
Default

Yeah, I wouldn't take a fraps reading for min FPS - everyone else is going on the reading from the console command "fps START SHOW", though you have to remember to do "fps STOP SHOW" then "fps START SHOW" again on each flight/track play. It's cumbersome, but will be a better indicator of stutters/low fps than fraps.

Plus, patrat is asking about mouselook because when running tracks for fps comparison with other people, it's best to leave the camera alone to do it's own thing so that comparisons are fair - let the track itself do the head movements..
__________________
Core I7 920 @ 4.2GHz
Asus P6X58D-E
G.Skill 24 GB DDR3 RAM 1600
GeForce GTX 580 3Gb
Win 7 Ultimate 64bit
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2011, 10:49 PM
Srinidhalaya Srinidhalaya is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

Average: 50
Max: 143
Min: 14

Ran it three times, average and max were give or take 5fps, but min was 14 each time, and only for a couple of seconds where a british plane is taking off and a bomb explodes taking up the entire view area. The following carpet comb sequence plays around 33fps and once the dust settles its back to the average and higher.

Thanks btw for the console commands! I don't like fraps very much...

EDIT: And the mouse look, I had edit views enabled and was using F10 to mouse look everywhere
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.