Realism or accessibility, what decision should be made?

[MikkOwl]

1. Realism is the default. A benchmark.
2. Lack of understanding of what real is, is met with explanation and education.
3. Accessability is the process of permitting the option of disabling or simplifying aspects of realism which is complicated, difficult or just inconvinient.

[Rote Dreizehn]

from my Side:

this Simulator must be fully realism. For me its very import that you can fly your
Plane truly as it was in 1941 (Technical/Physikal). Realism is the only Reason
that i am using this IL2 Series. Accessibility should be only how it be in real life as
Pilot.

By the Way:
I think Luthier will do his best, to bring IL2 Cod to the next Simulator Level.
Also will pay small prices if they need for continuing Developing to supply the
Developers

[Robotic Pope]

Originally Posted by MikkOwl

1. Realism is the default. A benchmark.
2. Lack of understanding of what real is, is met with explanation and education.
3. Accessability is the process of permitting the option of disabling or simplifying aspects of realism which is complicated, difficult or just inconvinient.

This was my understanding of the meaning of accessability and why I voted for it. Everyone should have the option to taylor the game to their liking whether that is fully realistic or not.

I think a lot of people have thought of accessability in meaning forcing on all players the opposite of realism to make it easier.