Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2011, 08:06 PM
hockeywarrior hockeywarrior is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by z0ttel View Post
Hi Tim,

in my case, the best upgrade so far (w.r.t. COD) was to go from Windows XP to Windows 7 - seriously

Before waisting tons of money in a new system I would wait for the patches which will arrive in the next weeks and then decide what to upgrade first. To get a feeling what the limiting factors are you can use perfmon.exe and gpu-z to monitor CPU-, RAM-, GPU- and VRAM-consumption while playing the game. The component which reaches the 100% limit, needs to be replaced.

On my system, the game runs between 30 and 50fps smoothly (not over London).
What settings are you running? I have an i7 930 2.8 ghz (stock clock), GTX 260 896 MB graphics card, 6 gigs of DDR3 RAM, and Winds 7 and am getting awful performance, even though I should be doing better than you lol.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2011, 08:29 AM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

In all honesty,

1.) True, it is too eraly to tell because some more patches are needed for this game to run well.

2.) As a matter of principle and common logic, following things you will have to do anyway:
- Install Win7 64bit - No point discussing WinXP performance with this game as it is definitively running better in DX10 (and not in DX9 which is WinXP limited to).

- Upgrade to Quad-core if you find a cheap CPU fitting in your existing motherboad, because new graphics drivers are able to handle multiple CPUs and the CoD game will be able to handle more than one CPU (within limits) therefore better having four cores than only two (besides Win7 has real core management, unlilke WinXP)

3.) Download the MOD that is available which give a tremendous improvement on the frame rate FPS by removing some "unecessary" (for the current state of pain and misery most users experience) graphics thus making the game playable in every PC.


I did points 1 and 2 myself, point 3 I can not comment upon as it was not necessary for me.

Happy Flying !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2011, 10:17 AM
Ivan Fooker Ivan Fooker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 91
Default

I made the following tests:

Running an I7 920 on 2.67GHz leads to 28FPS max.
Overclocking it to 3.01GHz leads to 32max.
Overclocking to 3.4Ghz leads to 44max.
Running it on max possible overclocked with that cooler at 3.84 leads to 59Fps.

Running the game on a C2D @ 4.8Ghz leads to 80Fps max.

As my HD5870VaporX (clocked 1200mhz) is running in idle mode while running CoD at 400mhz, i suppose the gpu power in general is not the bottleneck atm. for users.

So i come to the conclusion that ,similar to Il2-Sturmovik ,a high Dual Core has a better performance on CoD than a Quad Core atm, which is less clocked.

Means atm the GPu isnt a bottleneck, as the game doesnt seem to be correct adressed to it.ThePU keeps hanging in idle mode.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:11 PM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335th_GRAthos View Post

3.) Download the MOD that is available which give a tremendous improvement on the frame rate FPS by removing some "unecessary" (for the current state of pain and misery most users experience) graphics thus making the game playable in every PC. !
Been trawling the various threads with no luck, where are the details/location for these 'mods' and are these the ones that can only be used 'off-line' that Luthier referred to in his patch update?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:36 PM
garengarch garengarch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE View Post
Been trawling the various threads with no luck, where are the details/location for these 'mods' and are these the ones that can only be used 'off-line' that Luthier referred to in his patch update?
http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...ml#Post3265101
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:39 PM
Oldschool61 Oldschool61 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeywarrior View Post
what settings are you running? I have an i7 930 2.8 ghz (stock clock), gtx 260 896 mb graphics card, 6 gigs of ddr3 ram, and winds 7 and am getting awful performance, even though i should be doing better than you lol.
lower your resolution
__________________
“Violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism and tribalism and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children: organized religion ought to have a great deal on its conscience.”
― Christopher Hitchens
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:13 PM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

The new patch (curretly beta version availble, final patch probably on Monday) solves a lot of these issues:

No need for the MOD as they put the option to lower the graphic settings in the menu.
Kudos to the guy who worked in order to make the MOD possible as he was the main motivator to make this official
(I am a great believer of "pressure groups")

Besides this, the game now uses well four CPUs so Quad-core is the CPU to have for this game!

~S~
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:56 PM
TonyD TonyD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jozi, SA
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335th_GRAthos View Post
...

Besides this, the game now uses well four CPUs so Quad-core is the CPU to have for this game!

~S~
+1
__________________
I'd rather be flying ...

Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 | AMD FX-8350 | MSI HD7970 TFOC-BE | 8GB Corsair DDR-III 1866 | Win8.1 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-16-2011, 01:19 AM
15JG52_Brauer 15JG52_Brauer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Default

In fact it will use 6 cores - but from what I can tell does not use hyperthreading, so best bang for your buck may be a 2500k as a 2600k with hyperthreading may not help - certainly my cpu only uses 6 cores - the other 6 hyperthreads lay dormant (The only thing I have that uses them is for video encodding - then they work !!).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg core load.jpg (977.4 KB, 24 views)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2011, 01:41 AM
KDN KDN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 114
Default

Hey Athos
Did you do any change on your conf.ini...along the following lines....
2 cores - 3
3 cores - 7
4 cores - 15
6 cores - 63
8 cores - 255
for the ProcessAffinityMask=?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.