Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads
Reload this Page wep on RAF planes awol???? boost levels??? no 100 octane fuel:(
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-30-2011, 10:54 PM
madFinn madFinn is offline
Registered Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Default
Are you applying the pitot probe position errors to get CAS vs IAS? The charts for the Mark 2 are on page 20 of http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/Im...pit2Manual.pdf

Could be the source of your perceived lack of performance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-30-2011, 11:18 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by madFinn View Post
Are you applying the pitot probe position errors to get CAS vs IAS? The charts for the Mark 2 are on page 20 of http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/Im...pit2Manual.pdf

Could be the source of your perceived lack of performance.
Not sure, but that wouldnt explain why the mkI and mkIa have different top speeds.

The funny thing is the mkI with the 2 pitch should top out a little fast than the mkIIa... MkI should be 364TAS whereas the mkIIa should only make 354...

The main advantage of the mkii is the added hp and constant speed unit. But they only add in climb rate and not top speed

As of right now:
spit mkI - 260 IAS
spit mkIa - 220 IAS
spit mkIIa - 280 IAS

they should all be at least 280 IAS
Last edited by Biggs; 03-30-2011 at 11:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2011, 11:44 PM
Sternjaeger
Guest
  
Posts: n/a
Default
...omg are you already going so anal?!?! Why don't you lucky sods enjoy what you have and which some of us still can't play instead of wasting time looking for all these data?!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2011, 12:00 AM
Faustnik Faustnik is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 69
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger View Post
...omg are you already going so anal?!?! Why don't you lucky sods enjoy what you have and which some of us still can't play instead of wasting time looking for all these data?!
I love the tecnical info.

http://www.spitfireperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-31-2011, 12:03 AM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default
You guys are nuts! Have fun crunching the numbers though, if that's what floats yer skiff.
__________________
I'm pretty much just here for comic relief.
Q6600@3.02 GHz, 4gig DDR2, GTX470, Win7 64bit
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-31-2011, 12:06 AM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default
either way, all the RAF planes performance is down on what it should be below 16,500ft.

where's the 100 octane fuel....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-31-2011, 12:11 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default
Incorrect Boost indications and Boost Cut out mechanisation was been brought up before release. The developers are aware of it.
Last edited by IvanK; 03-31-2011 at 01:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-31-2011, 01:14 AM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Incorrect Boost indications and Boost Cut out mechanisation was been brought up before release. The developers are aware of it.
thats great to hear, thanks for posting
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-31-2011, 01:47 AM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Incorrect Boost indications and Boost Cut out mechanisation was been brought up before release. The developers are aware of it.
Are they aware of the incorrect top speed of thr mkI models?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-31-2011, 01:03 AM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadAim View Post
You guys are nuts! Have fun crunching the numbers though, if that's what floats yer skiff.
are u kidding me? I've logged about 14 hours now! (so Steam tells me) I LOVE this game..err sim... the spit is a joy to fly... alot of it is very "real" feeling...

its exactly like the pilots say "hurri is a much more stable gun platform" and the spits controls are "telepathic"...

believe me Im having a WONDERFUL time!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.