Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2011, 09:54 PM
123-Wulf-123 123-Wulf-123 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 190
Default

You're wasting your time Cato, there are a minority that will say the game is porked no matter how perfect or good it is.

Thats how they get their entertainment, If the game was the most perfect game ever launched and it came free with a buxom blonde Playboy Bunny, they would still complain about it


Oleg got us this far (despite my doubts), he's not going to let a poxy filter nor some minor optimisation get in the way now.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2011, 09:55 PM
cato_larsen cato_larsen is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 123-Wulf-123 View Post
You're wasting your time Cato, there are a minority that will say the game is porked no matter how perfect or good it is.

Thats how they get their entertainment, If the game was the most perfect game ever launched and it came free with a buxom blonde Playboy Bunny, they would still complain about it


Oleg got us this far (despite my doubts), he's not going to let a poxy filter nor some minor optimisation get in the way now.
Aye, I know. I just needed to say something. Guess it is like speaking to the big porcelain god, after a good night at the pubs. A lot comes out but it does nothing good where it hits
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2011, 09:56 PM
ICDP ICDP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 123-Wulf-123 View Post
You're wasting your time Cato, there are a minority that will say the game is porked no matter how perfect or good it is.

Thats how they get their entertainment, If the game was the most perfect game ever launched and it came free with a buxom blonde Playboy Bunny, they would still complain about it


Oleg got us this far (despite my doubts), he's not going to let a poxy filter nor some minor optimisation get in the way now.
LOL, I can assure you, the minority will turn into a majority when the western version is released. Do you even have the Russian version?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2011, 10:02 PM
cato_larsen cato_larsen is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICDP View Post
LOL, I can assure you, the minority will turn into a majority when the western version is released. Do you even have the Russian version?
Ah well. so be it then. It might happen, I will still be here, i will still fly.
Name another game other than IL2:1946 and Cliffs of Dover that will suit this genre. WW2 combat flight sim. It is nothing even close to it...

I am just hoping that in time, this will be as good as it has potential to be....
Cause already it is pretyy damn.... pretty... and feels very good to fly...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2011, 10:25 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default Let's talk clear!

I spend A LOT of time reading people of Maddox Games and TD talking about "rigid standards"...

Welllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll... Standards about WHAT?!?!?!

What I can clearly see untill now is something very close of the ANCIENT original IL-2 graphic engine, heavy as hell, with a REAL trouble rendering large towns, stuttering in the SAME WAY OLD IL-2 DOES, etc.

Remember the crap talking about mods?

"Ohhhh... this effect mod don't run well! It's not fulfill the rigid standards!"

Now we see all the reviews and videos of this beta stage sim? With this demanding graphic engine with litte things better than IL-2 1946?

Gimme a break, please! I'm tired of be a fanboy. CoD is a big deception until now. Let's face the true!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2011, 10:40 PM
l3uLLDoZeR l3uLLDoZeR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 113
Default

I want to play online...but oh yeah not only is that not possible they turned it into an arcade island battle. I'm not sure this is what any of us had in mind when we thought of multiplayer in CoD.

Now the silly ringed island should be the least of my concerns. I'm tending to believe the people that say this is the next falcon 4.0 more than the "It's gonna be just fine" crowd. If 2-3 years down the road Oleg and team prove me wrong then it will be good for all of us!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2011, 10:56 PM
Geier Geier is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 14
Default

After all we were blamed for conspiracy theories...

What official information we have regarding the very poor state of CoD?

CoD is not for free, we will pay for that. However, it seems the game is in gama stage. Who tested the game?? This incredible poor performance was not detected? This is not a conspiracy theory, it's a valid question.

It's so difficult to post some kind of information?? Yes, the game has problems and we are working on it.... but not a word.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2011, 11:05 PM
Kikuchiyo Kikuchiyo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geier View Post
It's so difficult to post some kind of information?? Yes, the game has problems and we are working on it.... but not a word.
Except for the fact that Luthier (Ilya) has been in here several times (the forums not this thread specifically) and pretty much said just that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2011, 02:24 AM
Tiger27 Tiger27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I spend A LOT of time reading people of Maddox Games and TD talking about "rigid standards"...

Welllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll... Standards about WHAT?!?!?!

What I can clearly see untill now is something very close of the ANCIENT original IL-2 graphic engine, heavy as hell, with a REAL trouble rendering large towns, stuttering in the SAME WAY OLD IL-2 DOES, etc.

Remember the crap talking about mods?

"Ohhhh... this effect mod don't run well! It's not fulfill the rigid standards!"

Now we see all the reviews and videos of this beta stage sim? With this demanding graphic engine with litte things better than IL-2 1946?

Gimme a break, please! I'm tired of be a fanboy. CoD is a big deception until now. Let's face the true!
No probs, your loss see you later, you obviously only read the negative posts and apart from Trees rants there is no evidence at all that this is not a new engine
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2011, 02:30 AM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger27 View Post
No probs, your loss see you later, you obviously only read the negative posts and apart from Trees rants there is no evidence at all that this is not a new engine
I didn't said it's not a "new" engine, just said that a lot of the OLD engine issues remains.

Fanboys didn't read well, I know. And I'm not going anywhere...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.