![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Steam poll | |||
| Yes I have and like using Steam |
|
256 | 54.47% |
| Yes I have and dont like using Steam |
|
67 | 14.26% |
| No I do not have Steam but will for CoD |
|
52 | 11.06% |
| No I do not have Steam and will not for CoD |
|
95 | 20.21% |
| Voters: 470. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone out there who doesn't know and is wondering what this Steam stuff is all about can install it and have a look for themselves -
http://store.steampowered.com/about/ I'm hoping they've just made the Steam requirement compulsory for using the game's built-in server-browsing features, and that we can still use third-party utilities like Hyperlobby, by-passing the in-game browser and Steam altogether if we want to, but I kind of doubt it. I thought the fact that they're effectively using two forms of DRM/activation, SolidShield's and Steam's, might make that so, but looking into it I see there are several other games out there that require both SolidShield and Steam activation. So... While there is the slim possibility that Ubisoft's decision to require activation via SolidShield DRM means it may not be necessary to use Steam at all, the chances are, they've just added that in on top of Steam's built-in activation requirements. Not enough information at this point to be absolutely sure about it. But, "Please note that the game will also use the Steam platform for services such as matchmaking, anti-cheat etc… So you will need a Steam account to play the game.", probably does mean, short of cracked versions, you will in fact need to download and install and make a Steam account in order to play online, and to activate your copy of the game even if you then just play off-line. xxxx happens. Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 03-19-2011 at 10:53 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have not pre ordered CoD,and will not buy it yet,as there are still a lot of unanswered questions.Its been said many times by people,with UBI involved anything can happen. I await the next bombshell with baited breath, 'cos I don't think this one will be the last... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't honestly think this is a Ubisoft decision I think this was 1C Publishings decision. That would also make sense why just a few days ago Ilya could say with such confidence that it would be available globally on 3/25. I am starting to think that Ubisoft is ONLY handling boxed copies, and if that is the case I will give as much of my money to 1C Maddox as possible by buying the Steam version of the game. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I was ready to buy the game and be happy with it even with constant needed online connection. But Steam? I might as well throw the money away. Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 03-19-2011 at 10:52 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't do that! I'll give you my paypal details.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
For people who are thinking its funny that some are now saying they will not buy CoD,really,its not.Lost sales are a tragedy for the future of CoD,because these are the very people who have been around for years,and could be relied upon to buy every expansion Oleg brings out.
The average gamer kiddie just wants the 'next big thing' all the time,and might buy CoD on steam,but within a few weeks will move on to something else without a backwards glance. Thats not funny. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very few of them will actually not get it. Steam is fine, and eventually they will come to realise that. I've been through this before with recalcitrant gamers refusing to use it... until they did.
And Steam will ensure the game is seen by millions, without expensive advertising. Losing 6 sales on the banana forums but gaining several hundred thousand on Steam is a no-brainer. I'm sorry to see anyone decide to miss out because they are afraid of what will be the standard way to buy games within the next 5 years, and the only way within 10, but if you don't like the future, you don't have to go there. Some people will never accept change. It's a pity. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barking at Ubisoft (while not unreasonable in 99% of the cases
I'm somewhat ambivalent towards STEAM myself. I use it and never had issues, and quite frankly it made things a lot easier for me when I was seriously ill in 2008/2009 and only had a notebook to play with, but I also don't necessarily like having yet another software running in the background. I do not necessarily see advantages for CoD apart from the additional revenue for 1C, since I consider this "going online for playing offline" trend of late a major PITA of every honest customer. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I purchased IL-2 on Steam and I launch it through Steam. Just like every other game I buy. I was a little worried that I wasn't going to be able to purchase CloD on Steam. I'm happy about the announcement. I recently purchased DCS A-10. It was the first game in a couple years that I didn't buy from the service. I really wish I could have gotten it on Steam. It would have made downloading and installing it much more convenient. I know most of the anti-steam crowd will just cover their ears and hum, but it really is the future. I'll be amazed if 5-10 years from now you'll still be able to buy physical copies of PC games and that's fine with me. I hope by then you will have joined us. IL-2 will probably be looking pretty old by then.
# of buyers because of Steam > # of boycotters. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|