Spitfire for FSX

[Immermann]

Originally Posted by Xilon_x

because A2A simulation not work whit 1C?
IF A2A simulation work whit 1C UNITED in future prepare and developed all airplane of ww2.FANTASTIC

No, because it's for FSX. A pig with lipstick is still a pig.

--EDIT--

Sure I wouldn't mind if they made planes for CoD (whatever the series should be called) in the future.

Originally Posted by Immermann

No, because it's for FSX. A pig with lipstick is still a pig.

--EDIT--

Sure I wouldn't mind if they made planes for CoD (whatever the series should be called) in the future.

Classic! Another quote from years gone by in UBI forum: "paint a turd purple and it's still a turd."

Very detailed work by A2A. Too bad they don't have a decent simulator for their model.

[Mysticpuma]

Nicely put Canuck. It begs the question: Would A2A consider making models available to 1C for use in CoD? It would only be the rame as paying for extra aircraft as in RoF? Cheers MP

[KG26_Alpha]

I'm just guessing but..............

That Spits poly count would probably make 5 IL21946 aircraft if not more.

Bung a few of those into the air, hmmmmm 12 v 12 and say good bye to your frame rates slide show time.




.

[Seeker]

Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha

I'm just guessing but..............

That Spits poly count would probably make 5 IL21946 aircraft if not more.

Bung a few of those into the air, hmmmmm 12 v 12 and say good bye to your frame rates slide show time.

.

FSX has multi play. Never tried it, but there's some impressive Team aerobatic films on youtube, so I don't see why the FSX ply count should be a barrier.

Of course, it's a newer engine than IL-2, but then so is CoD fish.

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by Seeker

FSX has multi play. Never tried it, but there's some impressive Team aerobatic films on youtube, so I don't see why the FSX ply count should be a barrier.

Of course, it's a newer engine than IL-2, but then so is CoD fish.

Have you seen FSX multi player................its a mess at the best of times, planes juddering around and warping all over the place.

Some expert here might tell us exactly what effect high poly's have on online flying.

IIRC it causes lag when in visual range.

But not 100% sure.




.

[Sutts]

I don't think it's the poly count that everyone's appreciating here. It's the detail they put into the systems and behaviour that makes you feel like you're operating a real aircraft. I don't think Oleg's Spit models will need much improving, inside or outside. I would like to see a faithful reproduction of the systems though and some real sampled sound might be nice too.

I've already sent a request to A2A regarding future integration with COD....haven't had any reply though. Wouldn't harm if some of you guys did the same so they know there's real interest:

support@a2asimulations.com

[onlyforbrian]

Originally Posted by Immermann

No, because it's for FSX. A pig with lipstick is still a pig.

--EDIT--

Sure I wouldn't mind if they made planes for CoD (whatever the series should be called) in the future.

I like ALL flight sims, including FSX, maybe that's because I'm a licenced pilot, there's not a thing wrong with FSX, nice change of pace from IL2, but like you, I'm drooling with anticipation for Cliffs of Dover...and...ALSO..if you don't like FSX, Microsoft FINALLY has a new sim coming out FS11 !! Maybe you might like this one better. Here's a preview video inside a Beaver...looks good to me..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gacq4...layer_embedded

[Therion_Prime]

WTF? There is no FS11 .....