Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #431  
Old 02-21-2011, 07:27 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

then there shouldn't be any need for the tir interface checkbox
Reply With Quote
  #432  
Old 02-21-2011, 07:49 AM
sigur_ros sigur_ros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 74
Default

That's for old games that aren't being developed anymore which can't possibly have Freetrack interface added.
Reply With Quote
  #433  
Old 02-21-2011, 07:54 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

so it isn't independent then... thank you
Reply With Quote
  #434  
Old 02-21-2011, 08:27 AM
sigur_ros sigur_ros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 74
Default

You asked for a need and I gave it to you, that says nothing of dependence.
Reply With Quote
  #435  
Old 02-21-2011, 09:00 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

WR: FT isn't completely independent though

LoBi: Yes it is, using FreeTrackClient.dll as Freetrack Interface

WR: then there shouldn't be a need for TIR interface checkbox

SR: That's for old games that aren't being developed anymore which can't possibly have Freetrack interface added.

WR: so it isn't independent then

SR: You asked for a need and I gave it to you, that says nothing of dependence.

where exactly did you go wrong, Siguer?
Reply With Quote
  #436  
Old 02-21-2011, 09:04 AM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

W_R are you stupid or are you kidding? they already told you FT is indipendent, if you want you can just remove the checkbox and rebuild the software, the source code is available...
Reply With Quote
  #437  
Old 02-21-2011, 09:07 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

as you would have read albx, removing access to NP would make it independent - yes
It would also show good faith... I suppose if someonone did as you suggested in removing and rebuilding, how long before someone else later on would reinstate and rebuild? It may also explain why there hasn't been any updated software for 2 and bit years
Reply With Quote
  #438  
Old 02-21-2011, 09:11 AM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Do we have an answer from the devs on whether FT will be supported in CoD? Don't have time to wade through 44 pages of what seems mostly bollocks...

Last edited by jimbop; 02-21-2011 at 09:14 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #439  
Old 02-21-2011, 10:35 AM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider View Post
as you would have read albx, removing access to NP would make it independent - yes
It would also show good faith... I suppose if someonone did as you suggested in removing and rebuilding, how long before someone else later on would reinstate and rebuild? It may also explain why there hasn't been any updated software for 2 and bit years
this is why the softwares are open source!! i can do what i want with it, also include a button that make me a coffe or scratch my back!!
To be more serious, i don't think you are stupid W-R, but you should understand that FT is a valide alternative at a more expensive TrackIR. Who, like me, like to build his own device, and is satisfied when something he did works very good, then you should use FT, different is who don't have time or don't like to build 3 simple leds then should buy TrackIR. BUT!!! do you think is right that a software should use ONLY 1 head tracking device, considering also that there are others and LEGAL? don't you think it is forcing people to buy Trackir? What if one day a car maker decide that you should use only 1 kind of gas for your car, or only 1 kind of tires? do you still feel free?
I hope I have been clear at what i said, english is not my native language, sorry...
Reply With Quote
  #440  
Old 02-21-2011, 10:42 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbop View Post
Do we have an answer from the devs on whether FT will be supported in CoD? Don't have time to wade through 44 pages of what seems mostly bollocks...
If you want the devs to answer that question, you can vote for it (make a google account if you haven't already):

Quote:
Originally Posted by julian265 View Post
Question for the devs - give it a tick if you want the devs to answer it
http://goo.gl/mod/k13t
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide:
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.