Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by robtek

What is strange is that NP gets all the bad PR for something the game-devs have, or better, haven't done.
The game-devs and their reasoning not to include a free interface, can't be reached or are unknown.
So the only known party, NP, must be guilty.

Sorry, that is the way it appears to me.

Please use the answer, that NP has influenced the game-devs of countless games, only with a proof.

Thank you

Why Oleg Maddox can't came to this discussion and write a word about the subject?

Think a minute, please. I'm in these discussions about Freetrack for sometime, and I know devs READ these topics but CAN'T answer sometimes...

Why? Maybe Oleg can write something about... What I know is that IL-2:CoD FOR SURE will have suport for the encripted NP interface... Why Oleg can't tell us if it will have too full 6dof suport for other HT devices/softwares?

Two of the "know parts" don't even can put your faces in these topics: devs and NP, to talk about alternative HT devices. And can I speak the true for you? I'm glad that here the devs isn't answer yeat, because in some forums I saw some devs with the same old lie about "hacks" and nonsense talking... After BIS put Freetrack suport into ArmAII, all this talking is meaningless, but still in the agenda of the NP trolls.

That way I can have some respect by the great team of Oleg Maddox, by now.