Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by swiss

You forgot the I don't care option - which applies to all of the current TIR users.

I know a lot of TIR users that will like to have Freetrack interface integrated in IL-2:CoD. Some of them are in my squadron. In my squadron we have TIR users, Freetrack users and even people that hate HT devices and have headaches when using it. But all like to have options.

If you don't care, just don't vote. The option is available.

[swiss]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

If you don't care, just don't vote. The option is available.

I didn't post to piss you off.
The question is: what is your goal with the poll.
I would think it's to sense a trend or the needs of customers, for that your two options are not enough.
Unless, of course you just want to proof your pov.

I think I'll vote against it, although I really love my FT setup.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by swiss

I didn't post to piss you off.
The question is: what is your goal with the poll.
I would think it's to sense a trend or the needs of customers, for that your two options are not enough.
Unless, of course you just want to proof your pov.

I think I'll vote against it, although I really love my FT setup.

My point is simple: see how many FT users will like to see it into IL-2:CoD, and how much people don't want, hate, whatever feeling they have against FT and have concerns about it make into IL-2:CoD.

If you are not mature enough to undestand that, you are one of the 3 people that vote against. Congrats! It's an opinion too!

[Royraiden]

I would like to know how many of those who voted against freetrack support are TrackIR users.

[swiss]

Atm I can tell you 33% have both.

[Royraiden]

Originally Posted by swiss

Atm I can tell you 33% have both.

Based on what?There was another poll before?

[albx]

Originally Posted by Royraiden

Based on what?There was another poll before?

I suppose that when Swiss voted they where 3 votes against, Swiss have both FT and TIR so 33% is refered about itself, right?