![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Should they use the stick for the gunner and fly the plane with mouse? Quote:
That's 5times faster than a modern battle tank. Last edited by swiss; 02-03-2011 at 09:29 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only compared to a mouse.. I'.m pretty sure that 4 seconds would seem like a lot longer if there was a 109 bearing down on you and you needed to go from one side to another
There is a slight difference in weight between a Tank turret and a MG turret btw. Last edited by winny; 02-03-2011 at 10:08 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Need to distinguish the electric turrents. Think these were often remotely controlled with computer assistance in aiming (i.e., no human at the gun). But maybe not all electrics? I can't think of any stock plane, but mod planes like the Hornisse, I think they usually put these types under AI control only. Page of interest:http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=19907 I think also, isn't this is late war stuff? So, not sure if electric will be relevant to CoD planes.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If CoD is going for realism then you would have to point your mouse at where you want to shoot and wait for the turret to catch you up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sort of.. If CoD wanted to model hand moved MG's realistically then weight and momentum would come into it. So if you move the gun rapidly then it would go slightly further than you intended because of the momentum, G would also come into it especially for the smaller planes.
I don't think there's a way to do it 100% accurately because it would probably end up with it feeling unresponsive and fuzzy. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
XBL GT: - Robotic Pope HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope Last edited by Robotic Pope; 02-03-2011 at 11:40 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I may be wrong but my impression is that the horizontal movement of "large" turrets in Il2:1946 is already slowed down a bit and sluggish (e.g. A-20G and B-25J). I didn't check it specifically... though.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
A lot of Remote Controlled and Computerized Control guns did exist and was used by all sides. Even Radar Ranging equipment was installed on B-29's and used before end of WW2. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was refering to the link posted and specifically during The BoB.
The link was to small automatic electric MG turrets that never made it past testing. Fitted to a shackleton (so that gives you some idea of the date!) Computer cotrolled.. I think. I know they had them later. I wasn't aware of anything like that being around in 1940. And when I said 'not exactly fast' I was comparing it to pointing and clicking with a mouse, not compared to other turrets. It gets confusing when you mix reality and sim ![]() Something of interest I found out when looking at Aerial guns/gunners. USAF Aerial Gunners (in most cases) weren't credited for kills individually, the kill went to the Group. So even if you shot down 5 you'd never get Ace status. There's a list somewhere of the top Aerial Gunners in WWII. 17 kills is the highest I've seen. Most seemed to get 4 or 5. Can't have been easy. Last edited by winny; 02-07-2011 at 07:58 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|