Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2011, 01:16 PM
W32Blaster W32Blaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
Default

ABSOLUTELY AGREED

190 is behaving like a lorry. This should be looked over, wether perfomance Data is correct. Especially when compared with other Fighter Planes of the Aera it seems to be messed up.

Since I have no Data to proof this
I just can politely ask for checking,
whether my 'feeling' about the various types of the 190 is correct.
  #2  
Old 01-22-2011, 01:23 PM
Kye Kye is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Default

From the sources I have come across, the 190 (the captured A series) could take off within the same distance as a Spit. It might be me, but I sure as hell can't get a 190 up in the same distance.

I read this in Alfred Price' 'Spitfire story'
  #3  
Old 01-22-2011, 01:42 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Yes tested Fw 190 at 1.6 Ata had similar take off runing to Spitfie Mark IX Merlin 66 engine.

Stock Fw 190 A series in IL2 had reduced acceleration ( intentionaly or not) but at least in ultrapack we corrected these issue many time ago with all new FM's Fw190s
  #4  
Old 01-22-2011, 01:59 PM
SturmKreator SturmKreator is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 95
Default

I tested the new slots of Fw 190 but I think the acceleration was improved a little, but I still feeling slow the acceleration
  #5  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:09 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SturmKreator View Post
I tested the new slots of Fw 190 but I think the acceleration was improved a little, but I still feeling slow the acceleration
New FM's Fw 190 A-3/A-4 have very close accelearion in take off runing to 109 F-4 ( We tested it online) So i think they have very good acceleration now and in dive it is even much more noticable.
  #6  
Old 01-22-2011, 02:38 PM
SturmKreator SturmKreator is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 95
Default

As far as i know the Fw190A had a similar acceleration compared to bf109g in flight
  #7  
Old 04-10-2011, 01:29 AM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

I've mentioned we need FMB improvements several times.

I don't have the COD yet, but from what I'm reading the Triggers,Events and scripting would be darned awesome tools to have in the IL2 TD versions. The FMB has always been half done in IL2.

I don't know if those tools can be implemented, but Oleg did mention he was staying very close to the IL2 FMB.

The future of IL2 is far from done. The BOB COD is only one battle of a huge war. The IL2 covers a large part of it, and it will take years for COD to approach the same resource levels.

Personally, I enjoy the Pacific war and it maybe at least 3 or more years before COD progresses to that point.
  #8  
Old 04-10-2011, 06:37 PM
P-38L P-38L is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Medellín, Colombia
Posts: 117
Default Weather

1. Randomize and variable weather while in a mission or flight. You can take off in a sunny day and finish in a rainy day.

2. Wind is very important. Sometimes when you fly in a sunny day you can be hit by wind and shake the airplane.

3. Torque. The AI airplanes doesn't have torque effect except the TB3-4M (The one with 4 engines). When you see this airplane taking off is beautifull because you can see the realism produced by the torque effect.

4. All the AI airplanes land the same perfect way. Randomize performance and ability should be implemented when AI landing.

5. When in a LAN you cannot see the movement of airplane surfaces of other players. I know is a lot of information but should be implemented in a on or off option in the conf.ini file.

6. No more stationary airplanes. Instead of that use normal airplanes to be placed by the user in FMB, using the livery of your choice. This will add more realism when be attacked. The actual stationary airplane is destroyed inmediately and all the airplanes stayed the same way of destruction. If use normal airplanes the destruction will be different allways.

7. If an AI airplane can land and park, should be start, taxi and take off to help you or to join to attack. This airplane shoul be used the same way in the request number 6 of my list.

8. Vehicles. Actually you must draw the path of the vehicles, when the veiche finish its path, stops forever. What about to implement vehicles that are constantly moving in a path with randomize movement like stop and move. Imagine this in a city.

I hope some of this ideas should be implemented in future updates.

Thank you.

Last edited by P-38L; 04-10-2011 at 06:39 PM.
  #9  
Old 04-12-2011, 06:55 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-38L View Post
1. Randomize and variable weather while in a mission or flight. You can take off in a sunny day and finish in a rainy day.

2. Wind is very important. Sometimes when you fly in a sunny day you can be hit by wind and shake the airplane.
Dynamic weather might make IL2 "compete" against CoD, so it might be out for that reason. That said, weather in IL2 is something of a weak point. There are sims older than IL2 which have better meteorological effects.

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-38L View Post
4. All the AI airplanes land the same perfect way. Randomize performance and ability should be implemented when AI landing.
I think that sometimes AI planes do crash, especially if they are flown by rookies. I agree that it would be cool if AI planes came in a bit high, low and/or fast especially under difficult conditions or when flown by inexperienced or wounded pilots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-38L View Post
6. No more stationary airplanes. Instead of that use normal airplanes to be placed by the user in FMB, using the livery of your choice.
Alternately, have stationary plane models JUST for planes that aren't flyable in the game and which aren't likely to be encountered in combat situations. That way you could shoot up an airport full of trainer or liaison type planes.
  #10  
Old 04-12-2011, 01:06 PM
kaix12 kaix12 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-38L View Post
1. Randomize and variable weather while in a mission or flight. You can take off in a sunny day and finish in a rainy day.

2. Wind is very important. Sometimes when you fly in a sunny day you can be hit by wind and shake the airplane.

3. Torque. The AI airplanes doesn't have torque effect except the TB3-4M (The one with 4 engines). When you see this airplane taking off is beautifull because you can see the realism produced by the torque effect.

4. All the AI airplanes land the same perfect way. Randomize performance and ability should be implemented when AI landing.

5. When in a LAN you cannot see the movement of airplane surfaces of other players. I know is a lot of information but should be implemented in a on or off option in the conf.ini file.

6. No more stationary airplanes. Instead of that use normal airplanes to be placed by the user in FMB, using the livery of your choice. This will add more realism when be attacked. The actual stationary airplane is destroyed inmediately and all the airplanes stayed the same way of destruction. If use normal airplanes the destruction will be different allways.

7. If an AI airplane can land and park, should be start, taxi and take off to help you or to join to attack. This airplane shoul be used the same way in the request number 6 of my list.


I hope some of this ideas should be implemented in future updates.

Thank you.
+1for all of the above
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.