Future of simulations 2010 discussion

[swiss]

a civilian flight sim is more likely to survive than a combat sim though,

what?

[Azimech]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

perfectionism, I guess, can go overboard and be just as detrimental as something half-assed if it is allowed to go to extremes.
+2

Without a certain amount of perfectionism we wouldn't even be on this forum, because there wouldn't have been a sim

Huh, another CTD? Ahw, that's too bad. Hey, anyone want some борщ?

[Wolf_Rider]

Sutts, you yourself mentioned options.
eg another sim series by DCS has a"simulation" setting for simmers and a "arcade" option for those who choose that. So there seems to be the best of, at least, two worlds there out in the open, with both having variable settings. Don't get me wrong, but I ain't going to get into a "full switch is or isn't the only way to go" argument with you.


Azimech (with respect) read the post again, you may have missed the "taken to extremes" part.

[Flanker35M]

S!

IL-2 has difficulty settings to choose from. I think SoW is no different. If a new sim pilot turns on full realism then he should not whine if failing terribly. There are options to smoothen your learning curve, step by step increase the realism settings until you feel comfortable with full real switch. Simple ain't it? Has nothing to do with masochism or egoism..Build your experience on a solid base, then go higher.

So..the more realistic procedures and such we can get the happier I will be. Be sure!