Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2010, 12:04 AM
Old_Canuck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the Dutchman View Post
When it first was announced i was in my 40's when it will be released i will probably be in my 50's............my god!
When it was first announced I was in my 50's .. I'm taking lots of vitamins and hoping to still be alive when it's released
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2010, 11:30 AM
mungee's Avatar
mungee mungee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Canuck View Post
When it was first announced I was in my 50's .. I'm taking lots of vitamins and hoping to still be alive when it's released
Hehe! Me too!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2010, 04:31 PM
Billy885 Billy885 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Canuck View Post
When it was first announced I was in my 50's .. I'm taking lots of vitamins and hoping to still be alive when it's released
You think you have troubles, I was in my 60's! I don't think I will make it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2010, 07:11 PM
BaylorMax BaylorMax is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Canuck View Post
When it was first announced I was in my 50's .. I'm taking lots of vitamins and hoping to still be alive when it's released


Me, too!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2010, 08:23 PM
Rubberchicken Rubberchicken is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Funny, the sim veterans are getting as old as the WW2 veterans we watch in the History channel documentaries.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-30-2010, 09:07 PM
genbrien genbrien is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 94
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
we are not going to see SOW this year.
would you please stop saying that in each thread, on multiple web sites... we kinda got the message

Thx
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-30-2010, 09:17 PM
Friendly_flyer's Avatar
Friendly_flyer Friendly_flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 412
Default

Hallo Luthier and company! Very nice shots, and to my eyes the propellers look great!

The serial on the Hurricane is off though. British WWII military serials was not hyphenated, but simply a 1 letter 4 numbers, like this (photoshopped):



If the serials are added as an actual code in an appropriate font, I suppose this would be an easy thing to fix.
__________________
Fly friendly!



Visit No 79 Squadron vRAF

Petter Bøckman
Norway

Last edited by Friendly_flyer; 07-30-2010 at 09:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-30-2010, 09:27 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobb4 View Post
A simple question from me, will enemy/friendly/other player/ai plane's main operating surfaces move or will we be forced like in the current IL2 to look for othe visual cues that they are trying to sideslip, barrel-roll etc.
At the moment all planes do not seem to show elevator,alerion, rudder or other movements other than on the player controlled plane. I could be wrong but all the visuals i have seen seem to reinforce this. Please tell me I am wrong.
Other than that I have to say everything looks great.

Example
Look at the screenshots of the 109's in formation and the J88's banking and all the control surfaces look static?
Actually, it's clearly visible that the Ju88 closer to the camera has its elevators slightly deflected upwards, the one in front also has a slight upward elevator but it's harder to spot...maybe they've already used their ailerons to bank and they are now just pulling on the stick to make the turn.

Now, as for why they have the exact same control inputs, i think this is to save CPU power in AI calculations. Just like IL2, it seems that AI in formation tend to move in almost perfect unison (although AI planes still do wiggle back and forth a bit in formation, you can check this out if you engage autopilot and up the time compression a bit). It sure would be nice to have some variation to make it feel more "human", but it won't bother me much if it saves processing power for other equally important things.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-30-2010, 09:50 PM
Friendly_flyer's Avatar
Friendly_flyer Friendly_flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 412
Default A question about RAF finflashes

To Oleg and Luthier.

In all the screenshots so far, the RAF planes have had the 24 inches wide by 27 inches tall finflash. This was first introduced in August 1940, but was not universal throughout Fighter Command before December 1940 (the squadrons presumably having more pressing issues than repainting markings).

An order for tail-markings for RAF planes was issued in May. It specified tricolour markings in RAF paint colours, red forward, and stated that they should "cover as much of the fin area as possible". Thus, a number of versions appeared. These are all taken from photos of Hurricanes in 1940:

"Full" tails:


"Cropped" tails:


Finflash:


RAF flew with the various "full" and "cropped" tail markings all through the Channel clashes in summer 1940, by late September/early October perhaps half of the squadrons had changed, and some stragglers flew with them even into early 1941.

Do you plan to have a look at this rather amazing variety of tail markings? If so, I have started collecting data on what squadron had what tail markings, and when they changed over to the regulation flash.
__________________
Fly friendly!



Visit No 79 Squadron vRAF

Petter Bøckman
Norway
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-30-2010, 10:49 PM
Bobb4 Bobb4 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
Actually, it's clearly visible that the Ju88 closer to the camera has its elevators slightly deflected upwards, the one in front also has a slight upward elevator but it's harder to spot...maybe they've already used their ailerons to bank and they are now just pulling on the stick to make the turn.

Now, as for why they have the exact same control inputs, i think this is to save CPU power in AI calculations. Just like IL2, it seems that AI in formation tend to move in almost perfect unison (although AI planes still do wiggle back and forth a bit in formation, you can check this out if you engage autopilot and up the time compression a bit). It sure would be nice to have some variation to make it feel more "human", but it won't bother me much if it saves processing power for other equally important things.

My bad, just looked at the pic from my home computer with a bigger monitor and you are right. The control surfaces are moving. Thanks for setting me straight
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.