Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2010, 04:59 PM
Splitter Splitter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
The birds in that video look really good. I'd love to see something like that in SoW.
With birds and the mocking deer (seriously, they look at you and smile) in X-Plane, there is a bit of a performance hit. And they are a little too common as I took three bird strikes in 10 flights which is statistically REALLY bad luck lol.

I wouldn't want the performance hit that comes with tracking bird's positions and then the graphical representation of flapping wings. I guess it would be cool to be able to switch birds on though.

Also, as good as X-Plane's flight model is, it isn't perfect. Better than any combat sim I have played for sure, but not perfect. Graphics for X-Plane 9 would be TERRIBLY disappointing to what the folks are expecting with SoW. Lakes with sharp corners, no real ground detail, randomized buildings in cities, etc.. Of course, X-Plane covers the whole world (and Mars lol) while SoW will have MUCH smaller maps.

Having said all of that, the only thing that X-Plane is really missing is combat. The flight model is so good that I could live with the graphics if they incorporated a good combat sim. The good news with all of that for companies like 1C is that the owner of X-Plane has no interest, apparently, in producing a combat sim.

So if you want a really good flight sim with a tremendous flight model, check out X-Plane. If you want a really good combat sim...like I do...well, here we are waiting anxiously for SoW. While I enjoy and have learned a lot from flight sims, there is nothing like a good air combat sim .

I guess my prejudice toward gameplay, damage models, and flight models over graphics comes from my interest in flight sims.

Maybe Laminar and 1C should merge just to make me happy? lol

Splitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2010, 12:58 PM
whatnot whatnot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splitter View Post
With birds and the mocking deer (seriously, they look at you and smile) in X-Plane, there is a bit of a performance hit. And they are a little too common as I took three bird strikes in 10 flights which is statistically REALLY bad luck lol.
This was a real downer for me in X-Plane for when I first tried it. Birds everywhere flying irradically and hitting ground and environment randomly without much bird-like behaviour. Even a bigger setback were the 'airportdeers' running around around the planet finding the green grass of the airfields. One would assume that if a deer hears roaring engines it'd run 10 miles non-stop instead of enjoying the sight of airplanes operaring while having a snack in the middle of all that.

I assume you can set them off etc so it's not that big of a deal overall, but the overall takeaway is that if you don't plan to do it properly in par with all the aspects of the sim don't do it at all. But knowing the quality of work so far with Maddox releases I have no fear of that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2010, 12:11 AM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnot View Post
Even a bigger setback were the 'airportdeers' running around around the planet finding the green grass of the airfields. One would assume that if a deer hears roaring engines it'd run 10 miles non-stop instead of enjoying the sight of airplanes operaring while having a snack in the middle of all that.
I recall a number of strips in western NSW where we had to do a low flypast to get the sheep off the runway before attempting to land Admittedly they got off the strip pretty quick when a 172 came roaring past.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2010, 02:19 AM
SpecialCake SpecialCake is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 32
Default

I was landing on a grass strip one time in a 172 when I noticed something on the runway.

"Is that an animal of some sort?" I asked my girlfriend in the co-pilot seat
"I don't know" she replies.

As we get closer, I see none other than a large tractor mowing the runway.

Just thought I'd share and contribute to the potential realism of this sim

You have to mow it sometimes haha!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-23-2010, 05:00 AM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

I'm wondering if the new game engine will be able to produce water falls? It would be a really detail for some locations. Maybe this would be done through animation?

Anyway...I know this subject "might" be a little OT for this thread, but i have never heard anyone comment on this topic. Realistic waterfalls would be a great "immersion" feature for some future maps...are their many waterfalls in the UK?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2010, 05:28 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
are their many waterfalls in the UK?
In the UK, a few that you could see from the air, under ideal conditions... maybe.

In the parts of the UK likely to feature on the BoB map? I doubt it.

Still, never mind proton45, I'm sure you can think of another idiotic suggestion for something to incorporate into the new sim. Bee hives? Molehills (on the airfields they would clearly be of military significance )? Piles of aluminium saucepans gathered to help the war effort (an obvious hazard to low flying aircraft...)?

This is intended to be a WW II air combat sim, not a reproduction of the entire 1940 universe.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2010, 05:33 AM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

This thread will be old news in a few more hours with a new update thread.

One week is just about the limit on keeping anything close to the topic.

It's about 9 am in Moscow now, so that probably means the update should be up within the next 6 or 7 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-23-2010, 06:11 AM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
In the UK, a few that you could see from the air, under ideal conditions... maybe.

In the parts of the UK likely to feature on the BoB map? I doubt it.

Still, never mind proton45, I'm sure you can think of another idiotic suggestion for something to incorporate into the new sim. Bee hives? Molehills (on the airfields they would clearly be of military significance )? Piles of aluminium saucepans gathered to help the war effort (an obvious hazard to low flying aircraft...)?

This is intended to be a WW II air combat sim, not a reproduction of the entire 1940 universe.
Idiotic suggestion? I dont thinks so (in fact my comment, was a question about the game engine)...in fact their are places on this planet where the waterfall is an iconic symbols of the landscape.

I find your comment to be less relevant then my own...AND I find your use of the word "idiotic" to be idiotic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nearmiss View Post
This thread will be old news in a few more hours with a new update thread.

One week is just about the limit on keeping anything close to the topic.

It's about 9 am in Moscow now, so that probably means the update should be up within the next 6 or 7 hours.
Yup, that is true...its the perfect time for an OT question about the capabilities of the new game engine. And I think you will find that its a question that has never been asked.

Last edited by proton45; 07-23-2010 at 06:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-23-2010, 11:20 AM
airmalik airmalik is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTE_Galway View Post
I recall a number of strips in western NSW where we had to do a low flypast to get the sheep off the runway before attempting to land Admittedly they got off the strip pretty quick when a 172 came roaring past.
The airfield I fly out of here in Queensland has a number of kangaroos. Usually they stay off the runways but I've heard of people having to go around because of them. A roo jumped in front of a landing RV7 once. It barely missed the prop, hit the leading edge of the wing with it's head and got knocked down. As it went down it's tail came up and hit the trailing edge of the flap damaging it considerably. The pilot had powered up to go around when he saw the roo jump in front and decided to continue. Fortunately the controllability of the plane didn't suffer and he was able to make a uneventful landing after a circuit. The roo? Got up and bounced away!

Here's a video I shot a couple of weeks ago at the airfield. Has some kangaroos too:
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-23-2010, 11:58 AM
PE_Tigar PE_Tigar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Default

I know a guy who hit (and chopped up) a deer twice in his 200-odd hours of flying . The plane was repairable the first time, totaled the second time. I guess he was unlucky. I had near misses with birds 4-5 times (once the bird actually swooped on my C-150 ).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.