Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY on IL2 Authorized Addons

[AndyJWest]

Originally Posted by bf-110

France

D.520 (for France,Vichy,Romania and Italy)
Potez 630
Breguet 693
Bloch M.B.210

Poland

P.23 Karas
P.37 Los
P.50 Jastrzab
LWS 6 Zubr

UK

Fairey Firefly
Fairey Barracuda
Vickers Wellington
Avro Lancaster
Short Stirling
Boulton Paul Defiant
Westland Lysander
Hawker Typhoon

US

B-26 Marauder
SB2C Helldiver

Germany

He-115
Ju-188
Do-17Z
Ju-88 heavy fighter versions (C?)

Italy

Piaggio P.108
Cant Z.1007 Alcione
Cant Z 501 Gabbiano
Re 2005

Japan

Ki-45 Nick
G3M Nell
Ki-67 Peggy
A7M
Ki-49 Helen
D4Y1 Judy
D4Y3 Judy
P1Y Frances

Have you actually bothered to read past threads that discuss the amount of work needed to add a single aircraft to IL-2, meeting the necessary standards? Anyone can come up with a wish-list, but try to be a little realistic.

[TheGrunch]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

Have you actually bothered to read past threads that discuss the amount of work needed to add a single aircraft to IL-2, meeting the necessary standards? Anyone can come up with a wish-list, but try to be a little realistic.

I think it's more like "any one of these would be nice" than "give us these, then", Andy.

[AndyJWest]

If that is what he meant, then I apologise.

I just don't want this forum to end up like AAA, where anyone who sees a vaguely WWII-related aircraft says 'gimme this'. TD are doing it for free, and should be thanked for what they do, not snowed under with unrealistic requests. Come to think of it, I'd apply that to 1C:Maddox too, and they will (hopefully) get paid for it.

All the same, I wanna Walrus!

[IceFire]

Something else I was thinking about posting. The damage modeling for the Ki-27 seems a little odd to me. A cannon surely destroys it but light machine guns seem to have little effect. It rarely lights on fire and it seems much tougher than other planes of a similar year. The Ki-43 is much weaker and easier to set on fire for example.

It's not just the setting on fire. It's the other components. Is it in some way flawed or meant to be this way?

[bf-110]

If they could add all,it would be superb,but even if they add only one of these,would be already a large step toward making IL2 a richer WWII combat sim.

Oh yes,and land vehicles,artillery and ships?I believe they are far less complicated to add ingame than planes(?)

[Billfish]

Ki-61 error thread updated.....

http://78sentai.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=401

K2

[ElAurens]

Wow, the current sight reticle could not be more wrong could it?

[Buster_Dee]

bf110, I'm just curious why you did not mention the early B24s. They're not one of my fav a/c, but I was just wondering since they were used by UK as well and had several roles.

Much agree on the B26. If this is not the best sim for high-alt heavies, than the mid-alt B26 would seem a good fit and is an odd omission, especially since it has one of the simplest cockpits and canopies from what I can tell from literature.

[Mysticpuma]

Actually, as far as it goes on the wish list, I would rather just see a cockpit added to the B-17 and B-24, rather than lots of new aircraft added. However, given the chance, I would love to see the B-26 in the sim.

Just adding a flyable 4-engine bomber would be a great official add-on and look back in the Ubi threads to see it has been one of the most requested additions for a very long-time.

Cheers, MP

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by Billfish

Ki-61 error thread updated.....

http://78sentai.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=401

K2

Billfish I've been wondering about something Ki-61 related. You mentioned in your posts about the Ki-61-Id (Id was called "Tei" right?). Would the Id be difficult to add and would it have any sort of performance advantage over the earlier Ki-61s? I'm thinking about multiplayer scenarios where it would be nice to have a intermediate level aircraft in those early 1944 scenarios.