Charts online PLAYSTATION Network??

I think you are on to something, Stinger. Those points in a mission, I believe, are the key to the boards. I just pulled out a calculator and you might be right. Maybe somewhat low with the 200 points, though. The accuracy, I think is meaningless in figuring rank. It's just a stat. All the other stats are probably also meaningless. The points is what matters most. Whether your team wins or loses doesn't matter. Either a total point score, or an average+games played or something like that. That's why, when a player stops playing, he drops and others catch up to him. Anyway, like I said in another post, get those points! And don't die (which you are pretty good at in your K-4).

[kozzm0]

There is no point trying to figure out the leaderboards.

The only mode that seemed to actually add up your stars as you earned them in matches was capture airfields. But recently I've been dropping levels even with great landings and lots of stars.

In strike when I unlocked the b17 it took only two b17-rampages and I jumped 8 levels.

In dogfight and team battle you can completely slaughter a higher-ranked opponent and lose levels, and lose to a lower-ranked opponent and gain levels. Gaining and losing levels seems to go in streaks too, levels go up for a while then they go down for a while.

I don't think accuracy has anything to do with it, there are people with bad accuracy right at the top and good accuracy at level 10.

I am convinced that the developers actually are monitoring the games on the servers, and probably gambling on them too, and if you don't beat the spread, they punish you by reducing a level, and if you beat the spread, they raise a level.

[STINGERSIX78]

i have reached rank 4 in arcade-strike(uups ^^). now im rank 384. but i have won every game (ca.30) since i was been in the top10.
mostly with the b17, a lot off points and kills, and almost a k/d 2-1.

[STINGERSIX78]

example...

rank -- Lvl -- points -- kills -- accuracy -- games played



384 -- 21 -- 75 -- 350 -- 2,05% -- 147 (thats me)


1 -- 44 -- 184 -- 68 -- 1,08% -- 106


10 -- 34 -- 148 -- 3 -- 0,17% -- 35



hmmmm.....

[spidercicc]

for them the column with the gamepad as a symbol is for games played in total or for those won?

[Gilly]

Originally Posted by spidercicc

for them the column with the gamepad as a symbol is for games played in total or for those won?

I'm pretty sure it's games played. Agree with the scoring system as I was ranked 2nd in strike for a while but am now way down. I've had it where even if I've wiped out every target and not been shot down I've dropped in the rankings??? Seems to have a mind of it's own. If it is related to say number of kills against points scored then it's a little unfair if you get a game where there's a lot of 'respawn' deaths!

[Zatoichi_Sanjuro]

Originally Posted by STINGERSIX78

example...

rank -- Lvl -- points -- kills -- accuracy -- games played



384 -- 21 -- 75 -- 350 -- 2,05% -- 147 (thats me)


1 -- 44 -- 184 -- 68 -- 1,08% -- 106


10 -- 34 -- 148 -- 3 -- 0,17% -- 35



hmmmm.....

Couldn't he just be getting a load of points from bombing? Like in CTA mode someone might have got a tonne of capture points but hardly shot down any enemy. He'd level up just from the points.

[Shadowcorp]

i've won my last 6 matches with somw with good k/d others against tough opposition but still won them all and my level still drops, however i have been suffering alot of lagg deaths and those crazy lagg double triple quadruple kills what is the source of that crazy lagg glitch thing anyone?

[kozzm0]

I'm tellin ya, it's the devs drinking vodka and gambling on the matches. It's their entertainment. If they bet on you and you win, your level goes up. If they bet on your opponent and you win, your level goes down.