Just my thoghts on the latest Screens update +examples offuture hopes for SoW

[Jaws2002]

The only things i find disapointing so far are the color of the sky and sea water. In all SOW, in game screenshots I've seen, the water looks like in a bussy port, and the sky looks like over a big poluted city. If you traveled around the world a little, you probabily know that the sky and sea color can be dramatically different from place to place, or from day to day.

Is like they are afraid to make the ocean water BLUE. If you go few miles away from the port , the sea water is just ....Blue. Is not mudy or dirty, with a lot of sand in suspension, like in all the shots I've seen so far.

[Flanker35M]

S!

Still WIP, the game engine is not final yet and colors etc. are still tuned and made if I read the news right. Even the pics wold be from "in game" the game is not finished thus WIP. So be patient

I agree 100%. Some forum members are confused has to what 'in game' means.

[Specht]

Those pictures are IN GAME, they are taken inside the engine of the game, they are not blue screen/render pictures.

And they are also WIP pictures because the textures, lightning effects and all those things might be changed for the final product, but being WIP does not mean it's not in game, your conception is completely messed up.

WIP IN GAME SCREENSHOTS.

Oh gawd, In game means all things will appear 'in game', they may add more stuff to it, 'in game' does not mean 'with a place holder background'.

[philip.ed]

Tree, original il-2 pics are in game shots. However, if a patch was released to make the terrain WoP standard that terrain would begin to look rather crap. These are in game shots, as Oleg and Luthier have stated, which is showing an in-game test map. Nothing is final, but the shots are taken in game. You are a very stubborn person from what I have seen, so I doubt you'll believe me here.

[SlipBall]

The game already appears to be ten fold what IL-2 is today. I have been very amazed at what was shown and was told about in the recent month's up-dates. If it was released today, who here would be able to put it aside. Bring it to market by the anniversity and I will be a happy camper...many of those pic's are grabs from in-game, and they look great to me.

[Insuber]

For newcomers who haven't seen them yet, just a couple of - very old - videos, to appreciate the detail of cockpits:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwxtX...layer_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphWf...layer_embedded

Bye,
Ins

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

Oh gawd, In game means all things will appear 'in game', they may add more stuff to it, 'in game' does not mean 'with a place holder background'.

Engine rendered in the engine and indicated as such (and I believe the list above are all marked by Oleg as being rendered by the engine) are "in-game". Not all features are necessary turned on and final quality will probably be far different.

The difference between what we're seeing and the standard fare of video game makers showing off their work is that Oleg isn't afraid (although maybe he should be) to show off early work in progress where all of the hard work has already been done but not everything is close to final quality. We know that all shots so far have been done in the basic renderer as well ... Oleg says that is what the DX9 version is like but I suspect that is DX9 with features turned off.

Some shots are rendered in-engine but with a placeholder background. Sort of like the object viewer in IL-2. That can also be considered in-game or in-engine...

We could all split hairs on this mind you

good reply Icefire , I will take that onboard.