![]() |
#441
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wouldn't happen to be Mirage IIIs or IVs would they?
Su-25s usually have a hump back behind the cockpit. ![]() Last edited by Soviet Ace; 12-18-2009 at 05:57 PM. |
#442
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sud aviation voltigeur ?? |
#443
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by STINGERSIX78; 12-18-2009 at 06:04 PM. |
#444
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mirage's are French actually. Not Russian.
![]() |
#445
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sure. i was looking at the "Su-25"... ![]() |
#446
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
im not so sure it is a mirage... could be wrong though.
|
#447
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no mirage. Warsaw Pact plane.
|
#448
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#449
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No they're not Mirage's. Figured that out because I figured, they had to be some kind of Eastern European nation. Which during the cold war (which these jets seem to be from) all had that Soviet-esque look. Well they may not be directly Soviet produced, constructed, or planned out. But they are Eastern European. Which leaves me to my conclusion of calling them the Romanian IAR-93B
Which miraculously, wouldn't be such a bad jet to try and fly. I think, it was actually one of Romania's last home grown jets because afterwards, they mainly stuck with Soviet ingenuity like the MiG-21, MiG-25, etc. |
#450
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
ding ding sing we got a winner!! ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|