New HOTAS advice

[Chivas]

You will need rudder pedals with the CH Fighterstick because its not a twist stick. I guess I'm the only one who doesn't like the poor transistion thru the X and Y axis of the CH gimbals.

If I were you I would spend the extra monies and buy a full setup. You won't regret it in the long run. I don't have the Logitech G940 but its one I'm very interested it.

For those that do have the G940 does it use electrical centering forces or spring centering, and how smooth are the gimbals going thru the X and Y axis.

[nearmiss]

I guess I'm the only one who doesn't like the poor transistion thru the X and Y axis of the CH gimbals.

I don't think it is that poor, but if you pay attention you will notice. I've not noticed how much it affects virtual performance.

If you had to rate the fighterstick, how would you rate it with 100% being the best of the best.

I would easily rate it a 95+%. I would prefer not to have the sliders on the sides of the stick, because you can't use them with your hand on the stick in combat. You can't take your hand off the stick and, if your left hand is busy as well with other things on the prothrottle.

IMO, it would be best to have some extra slider switches on the prothrottle. This way you could slide for trim, instead of bumping a switch to do the work.

You have to remember that there is a slow response (delay) on the pitch trim in IL2 after all the online wars over "trim on a slider". That screws the pooch another way. LOL

[Robert]

Originally Posted by Chivas

You will need rudder pedals with the CH Fighterstick because its not a twist stick. I guess I'm the only one who doesn't like the poor transistion thru the X and Y axis of the CH gimbals.

If I were you I would spend the extra monies and buy a full setup. You won't regret it in the long run. I don't have the Logitech G940 but its one I'm very interested it.

For those that do have the G940 does it use electrical centering forces or spring centering, and how smooth are the gimbals going thru the X and Y axis.

I'm sure your not the only one. I was startled at the feeling in the beginning and compared to the other sticks was something I didn't like. It didn't take long to get used to and now I barely notice it. Funny though. I recently went for almost a month without flying and it took me a few minutes to acclimate myself to the center, and is one of the reasons I'd mention the 'transition' to someone looking at CH. I'd stress that it doesn't take long to get used to it, but it feels different than what you'd expect, and in all honesty it's that difference between the expectation of how all other sticks feel while transitioning across the center and how CH feels that causes the 'discomfort.' Once I realised that it's just mechanically different I was determined to go with the flow. It didn't take long.

As a matter of fact you are the only person I've ever read about who couldn't get used to the transitioning, chivas. It's important to be comfortable with what you fly with.

[Chivas]

Your probably right, as I never gave CH much of a chance, and may have gotten used to it.

I'm currently using a
MSFF2 joystick
Cougar Throttle
Saitek Pro Rudder Pedals

with back up sticks.
Cougar
CH Fighter Stick
Saitek Aviator
X52 ( oh ya I forget I took a sledge hammer to it )

But I'm interested in the G940, but I'd hate to give up my Cougar Throttle and Foxy Programming. Although you can mix and match joysticks and throttles as neccessary. Unfortunately you'd have to set some Hotas parts under the desk, Although you can just take the cct. board out of the peripheral your not using as I did with the Cougar joystick. Someday I may find an appropriate U joint and make a gimbal for the Cougar.

[hiro]

I will +1 to CH. The stick is loose feeling but so far great. Fighter stick, someone mentioned you need big hands, its true. I can't reach all the buttons and hats, but I've learned to move my hand positions w/out skipping a beat to hit all the buttons.

The pedals are excellent, only complaint is the foot placement should've been a little wider. I think CH was catering to the ladies . But its smooth and IL-2 translates oh so awesome to rudder.



The throttle is great also. I thought, 'nah I can use the throttle on the fighter stick' but decided to get it anyway (save shipping) and due to recommendations from CH hotas users' postings. Whats cool is the extra buttons and hats on the throttle really help with adding more flight necessary controls at your finger tips.

What I like about CH is the smoothness and feel. They translate very well to IL-2. I have Il-2 on 100% sensitivity and I can fly easy. I like the feel of the pedals and its so much better than the twist on joysticks. Twist on joysticks for rudder is like having soy tofu meat as opposed to CH pedals for rudder, a filet mignon when you have beef cravings.


Only thing lacking are trim wheels on throttle but you can get over that with CH programming.

CH allows you to use the joystick straight out of the box (XP has settings in game controllers in control panel and you can configure there and in IL-2 hotas settings) or you can get the CH control manager software and program as much as you want for those wanting to delve into that.

In this I found out that its better to program using CH control manager software as you can get more out of your CH set up.

It's well worth the price tag and warranty is long (2 yrs).


With my previous joystick (logitech) 70% sensitivity was bouncing around the place (I like my control settings sensitive, a carry over for max mouse sensitivity from FPS days).

Also I ran into several posts in the 'zoo and CH hanger where people still use the gameport versions and been using same equipment today that predated IL-2.

Not only that, a friend works for the govt with UAV's programming teams and the UAV crews use CH stuff to fly them around.




That would be sick / cool / awesome / tight / fresh / tits if the HOTAS warthog gave every sim you used it with an avenger gatling gun in game like Chuck Norris mere presence includes his uber roundhouse kick.

for me...its still the best combination:

MSFF2 (or older precision pro) or CH Combatstick
+
X52 or X52 pro throttle
+
Saitek rudder pedals (only tried them but Im still saving for one)


G940 is good as I heard but you need to use only logitech gear...no room for combinations....

[Chivas]

Originally Posted by Tvrdi

for me...its still the best combination:

MSFF2 (or older precision pro) or CH Combatstick
+
X52 or X52 pro throttle
+
Saitek rudder pedals (only tried them but Im still saving for one)


G940 is good as I heard but you need to use only logitech gear...no room for combinations....

The game would only see the G940 as one unit so you could use other Hotas parts, but in the case of the G940 where the Hotas parts can't be seperated you would have to put the parts of the Hotas your not using to the side somewhere. Or, as I said in my case, I took the cct board out of the Cougar joystick and put it in a smaller box. Easier to hide.

[Sokol1]

The game would only see the G940 as one unit so you could use other Hotas parts,

Differently of another HOTAS, G940 is see by Windows as TREE individual game devices.

Logitech_Mark
G940 shows up in Windows as three devices - Stick, Throttles, rudder pedals.

This limit you to use more one device, due IL-2 recognize up to four.

...but in the case of the G940 where the Hotas parts can't be seperated you would have to put the parts of the Hotas your not using to the side somewhere.

You can use G940 without pedals, in some review posted in these forums the guy still using your Simped Pedal (that use HALL sensor and exponential curves).

But stand-alone G940 pedal is useless - don't have own USB controller...

Logitech_Mark
The pedals are not a stand-alone set of USB pedals with a proprietary connector. They are axes extended from the main unit.

Due this, you can hook only more one device, in IL-2.

Another consideration is that is possible use G940 with FF off - only with return to center force. I consider M$ FF 2 USB with FF off better (more precise) than my CH Combatstick.

Sokol1