How about markings for static planes...

[Bloblast]

Good point

[senseispcc]

Wait, patience, patience, we shall bomb Engeland into surrender...

[Plt Off JRB Meaker]

Originally Posted by senseispcc

Wait, patience, patience, we shall bomb Engeland into surrender...

I don't think so old chap,us RAF boys are always here ready to give you Huns a bloody nose!................however a shiny new flyable Wellington bomber would make the task a tad more enjoyable one,you listening Luthier?

[Foo'bar]

Originally Posted by kedrednael

So you have small cars, each with different small number plates, but not static planes with big markings.. . It sounds pretty stupid, like bad development decisions.

No decision. Just lost. So hard to understand?

[Ataros]

Originally Posted by Dutch_851

Agreed.

This is a real pain in the proverbial for ground based screenshots/video.

For video replace static aircraft with not static put on "idle".

This solution would work for offline gameplay as well. However too many non-static airgroups online degrade performance. But static aircraft degrade performance and loading time online too and better not be used.

Static aircraft are missing many features in order to reduce hardware load. This is their purpose. If performance is not an issue for you just use non-static aircraft instead.

[addman]

Originally Posted by cheesehawk

I agree with you, but also want to advise you'll have to take a back seat for the fixes, as the fixes will come for the majority before the minority. But I'd love to see more planes, and see them with working FM.

I understand this, being a realist sucks sometimes.