Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-31-2011, 11:24 PM
Kankkis Kankkis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 584
Default

Me too, buildings options to min and grass off.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-01-2011, 12:05 AM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,678
Default

Been having a hoot on my low end PC. Agree, dogfights over water are good and apart from buildings, grass, etc still flyable on medium. (1280 x 768 res)

The 'strapped in' FOV with headracking (Shift F1) is a bit odd though and being 'unstrapped' doesn't really have much of a disadvantage but gives you all axis to move in. Enjoying the Spitty and the Hurricane but noticed the Merlins do not choke/stall quite so abruptly as in 4.101 under neg G with CEM enabled

Find it far more difficult to spot enemy at distance and need to study the weapons load outs as I am emptying my magazines at 200m with far less damage inflicted compared to Il1946. All in all I think it will be great (but a lot of reading, flying and practice to do before I try this in MP).

Last edited by SEE; 04-01-2011 at 12:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-01-2011, 12:10 AM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

So to some it all up turn it all off and play a game so jacked up that your better off reinstalling the old IL2. I hope you guys are reading your own posts, I thought you guys were being sarcastic. I'm glad its not been released in the usa. Just release it in a year when your done making the game.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-01-2011, 01:11 AM
BobTuck BobTuck is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEditor View Post
So to some it all up turn it all off and play a game so jacked up that your better off reinstalling the old IL2.
Not at all. It's just about prioritisation (which would need to be done anyway because the sim is so future proofed). I have the most important things on as maximum, i.e. aircraft detail, damage effects, visual effects, buildings amount, shadows, and of course this is not including the FM, DM and other vastly improved things.

To say you're better off installing IL2 is just being overly pessimistic, and ignorant of the good things on offer.

BobTuck.

Last edited by BobTuck; 04-01-2011 at 01:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-01-2011, 01:32 AM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTuck View Post
Not at all. It's just about prioritisation (which would need to be done anyway because the sim is so future proofed). I have the most important things on as maximum, i.e. aircraft detail, damage effects, visual effects, buildings amount, shadows, and of course this is not including the FM, DM and other vastly improved things.

To say you're better off installing IL2 is just being overly pessimistic, and ignorant of the good things on offer.

BobTuck.
Sorry, I most be swad by my English friend who is giving me the frame by frame account of how buggy and poor preforming the game really is. I guess maybe my point should be that the game should not have been released in this state and stop trying to dress up a turd...In its current state anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-01-2011, 02:01 AM
BobTuck BobTuck is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Default

Well, on my mediocre rig I just got 40 fps+ consistently in a squadron attack mission against 9 stukas who were bombing a coastal target. In fact it only dropped below that when I came in to land.

I am quite happy that this is playable, even at this early stage of release.

My rig is a quad core2 Q6600 (2.4GH) with 4MB system RAM, using a 64bit windows 7 OS, so not cutting edge anymore to say the least.

BobTuck.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-01-2011, 02:30 AM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTuck View Post
Well, on my mediocre rig I just got 40 fps+ consistently in a squadron attack mission against 9 stukas who were bombing a coastal target. In fact it only dropped below that when I came in to land.

I am quite happy that this is playable, even at this early stage of release.

My rig is a quad core2 Q6600 (2.4GH) with 4MB system RAM, using a 64bit windows 7 OS, so not cutting edge anymore to say the least.

BobTuck.
I hope not 4MB of RAM...LOL.

DCS A-10c was released as a beta and I just think Maddox's should have done the same. I know that doesn't change the state of the game but it at least tells the customer that this game is not near finished.

How much euros did people pay for this product? Is it more then $49.99?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-01-2011, 02:56 AM
Defender Defender is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEditor View Post
I hope not 4MB of RAM...LOL.

DCS A-10c was released as a beta and I just think Maddox's should have done the same. I know that doesn't change the state of the game but it at least tells the customer that this game is not near finished.

How much euros did people pay for this product? Is it more then $49.99?
That would be an idea for next time perhaps. Pre-order and with it you get a beta copy of the sim.

That said, it seems many people with low to medium systems are achieving their desired FPS with a whole lot of customization. A-10C had large differences in frame rates between the beta's and final release, so once this product gets optimized it should really move. From the video's i've seen, the sensation of flight is unlike anything I've seen in a sim, the atmosphere is also great. I actually want to freeflight where most combat sims I need to ack ack something.

Once the global release is complete, I think we'll see some expedited progress. As long as support continues, I will be happy. I don't mind buying something now to shelve it for a little while, or to help bug squash improving the return on my investment.

$50...people with 2+ years in Area 51 over on Fighter Ops forums have spent more than that. That project is going on 6 years now as well. (no ill will toward FO by the way, just saying).

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-01-2011, 04:28 AM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

As long as the support from the dev team is there, then I'll be cool and hand them may $50. Hope one thing on the list is a 64bit .exe
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-01-2011, 08:54 AM
BobTuck BobTuck is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEditor View Post
I hope not 4MB of RAM...LOL.
Oops, yeah.

4GB!

I must add that I have tweaked the sim using custom ini settings, so as Defender says, once the devs have optimised some more, I reckon this sim will really move well at high settings.

BobTuck.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.