|
|
|||||||
| King`s Bounty: Warriors of the North Next game in the award-winning King’s Bounty series |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-12-2012, 06:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
King's Bounty MMO
Now I put a lot of thought into this and I know the history of what happens when you take a good single player game and make it into an MMO but I think if they didn't do anything super huge it would be epic.
Focus on your core players forget the carebears. Keep it turn based with exploration across a larger play field. Lots of character customization. So much potential without having to spend a lot of money for them. And for the love of god don't make it free to play make it a sub. based game. I along with many of players would dish out hard earned cash for a game that we love to play. I would gladly give my money away to keep funding a small tight knit community of gamers. Lets start posting what we would like to see from this type of game so if they ever do its on the right path 1. Large world to explore that could take forever to explore. This is a lot easier with this type of game because we require a lot less graphics wise. 2. Lots of customization between class's, no class able to dip into other classes type of play. Keep it unique 3. Vast choices of armies to choose from. 4. More variations on spells 5. Change for warrior type class so that rage can be used on bosses. 6. Co-op fights verus other players and bosses. Could you imagine teaming up as a warrior with a mage friend to buff the crap out of you large army while u focus on demolishing. 7. Players input on expanding story line 8. No quests just xp from exploring and bosses. 9. Story line ever changing based on your decisions. Just some ideas too busy playing to wanna type em all out will finish up later. Last edited by gunnyhighway; 11-12-2012 at 06:22 AM. 
|
|
#2
11-12-2012, 07:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
When any game is transformed into a MMO, it rarely can be called anything else than an attempt to cash in.
I think King's Bounty should always be a single player game. Maybe you should suggest your idea in HoMM forums since that series has already been ruined so it can't get much worse.
|
|
#3
11-12-2012, 07:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As long as they don't make it a true mmo just give it some mmo features. Keeping up replayablity so we are not waiting for the next single player kings bounty every 6 years.
|
|
#5
11-12-2012, 08:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
11-12-2012, 08:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
11-12-2012, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If they released a King's Bounty MMO in the condition this game got released they be lucky anyone played it longer than a week tops. Hell you have to be able to make a single player game before you can make a MMO. Plus this company doesn't have the money to make a real MMO nor do I think they want to invest in one. MMOs are kinda fading now those are so 5 years ago now a days people are actually going back and demanding fun multiplayer and coop game now again which I am sure glad.
Its been proven though you can still make money off single player games without a tact on crappy coop or multiplayer hence Skyrim is probably going to be the biggest selling single player game of all time and will probably make the top 10 list of best selling video games by the time it runs its course Im sure. I mean hell Bethesda all they do is make single player games and they are one of the biggest game companies too(and yes I do know they have published multiplayer games) The point of this is King's Bounty could become a best selling single player game if they put a little better effort into it next time. If 1C Company does not want to spend the time or money to make the game better just sell it off to Ubisoft and with their experience with HOMM series I am sure they could throw some good money at it and make it pretty awesome with the current developer(of course it will get a crap DRM like they do with all their games).
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
