Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:49 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default how about restricted fuel?

did pilots go at real life at full throtle to avoid someone locking in his six?

how about the server limiting fuel?
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:20 PM
ATAG_Doc ATAG_Doc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: A brothel in the Mekong Delta
Posts: 1,546
Default

I do not understand what you wrote. Do pilots go full throttle when someone is their tail? Is that the question?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:22 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

He's trolling, he knows what he said is riddiculous and will start a debate.

By debate I mean some irritated responses followed by let's all love and hug raaaid responses all of which = attention for the loveable troll.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:30 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

i meant in real life people would save fuel for war reasons

in the game people go ALWAYS at full throtle which is safer and unrealistic

and yes i was intending to open a debate thats what forums are for
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:55 PM
Toni74 Toni74 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lucca
Posts: 109
Default

in RL i would throttle down and let him pass.

but indeed it would be a interesting feature in some other aspect: bombing the enemie's fuel tanks mean that they will have less fuel to share to their pilots.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2012, 06:15 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

i propose an online war in which ALL is centered about fuel:

truck, train and ship fuel supplies to be bombed to make the enemy run out of fuel

planes departing with 20% fuel trying to shoot the bombers who want to bomb the fuel supply

bongo i admitt in the past i was annoying, well in my favour i have to say i had to vent off the bizarrity of tv which i hardly wacth now combined with a problematic med i reduced drastically. SO i made up my mind to dont take advanatge of anonimity and just share in the forum what i would share with real life friends. I bet you already noticed a change of attitude in these late threads of mine, so all you like bongo just try to start a new page with me, i did
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2012, 07:33 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
i meant in real life people would save fuel for war reasons

No.
There was an interview with a La pilot who stated he made sure he was always flying at >=400kph to be save, and neither he or his supervisors did give a damn.

Quote:
in the game people go ALWAYS at full throtle which is safer and unrealistic
No. Maybe you do.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-06-2012, 09:20 PM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Fuel management was an important skill for pilots and part of their flight training.

The application of those skills depends on the supply of available fuel, The distances or duration that the pilots had to fly in the missons and they types of sortie they we participating in.

In our game fuel is unlimited, distances are relatively short and we don't have to patrol a set area for hours on end.

Raaaid is right. If the missions had realistic parameters, then pilots in game would fly in a more historically correct mannor.

Unfortuantely not everyone would want to fly in missions like that and Flying around at full throttle makes for a fun exciting action packed mission!

As a case in point on the 2nd May 1943 the RAAF fought a prolonged dogfight with the Japanese near Darwin. 5 of the 13 Spitfires lost was due to fuel starvation. After this encounter they stoped dog fighting and changed tactics to boom and zooming the enemy.

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:48 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
did pilots go at real life at full throtle to avoid someone locking in his six?

how about the server limiting fuel?

Of course real life pilots did not fly on full throttle all the time. It would have been impossible to maintain formation, engines would become unnecessarily hot, engine overhaul time might have been compromised and fuel would be consumed too quickly.

I assume your are using CEM or the question is pointless.
If you are using CEM fuel will be used more quickly so again the question is pointless.

And there is more to avoiding someone on your six than using full throttle.

The term 'locking on' suggests you are flying arcade settings using devices like 'Lock On To Target' so again the question is pointless. You can play with whatever you like in arcade settings and create whatever illusion of air combat you wish.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders

Last edited by klem; 11-07-2012 at 09:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:50 PM
Damixu Damixu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 128
Default

In principal the limiting the fuel is very right and according to the historical limits. For example Messerschmitt 109 E's were able only to dogfight over Britain maximum of 15 minutes because risk running out of fuel.

Due the state of this game right now, I don't endorse any restirctions and hinderance of gameplay right now. Maybe sometimes upcoming years we will have this Battle of Britain simulator and there are time and place to enforce each plane limitations in terms of range.

And if we are talking about historical maps at full scale like this is already, naturally the fuel will run out very soon on german side on Battle of Britain scenario.

Last edited by Damixu; 11-07-2012 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.