![]() |
|
Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
So today The Card arrived. Just got it installed with latest drivers and had time to quickly run a test with CoD. For AMD users oh the joy, the 3 lines of death are GONE!! YESSS!! Spit vs 110 track..maximum 68fps minimum 2fps(when it loads into cockpit), average 60FPS! ![]() Will do some more testing and report in this thread, but from what I tested the card is DAMN fast! ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congratulations!
![]() ![]() Could you run the test with SSAO on and off, and with vsynk off and on also just to compare to gtx580 performance tests from here http://translate.google.com/translat...hp%3Ft%3D68723 What is your AA setting and resolution? With vsync ON triple buffering must be forced ON I think to avoid short drops to 30 fps in complex scenes. gtx 580 results vary from 51 average to 65 with vsynk and SSAO off. Clouds ON in realism settings. 43 avg with SSAO and vsynk ON AA 4x 1920x1080 You can pause the track after loading cockpit and only then start the counter to avoid 2 min fps. You may also first run it once without a counter to load all textures into memory and record results only in the 2nd run. This is how they tested 580 and other cards there. Do you experience the stripes bug on the border of land and water? PS. E.g. sample results for 580: Quote:
Last edited by Ataros; 01-24-2012 at 03:31 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excellent news! It's just so damn expensive
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
I run the card on the stock settings 925/1372MHz, 1920x1080 32-bit resolution. SSAO is Off as well as AA. Will post my CCC and game settings, need to plug in the joystick etc. again..had CoD kind of shelved before the patch ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you very much! Could you please run "The black death" track. The results for gtx580 are for this track. I did not notice you were running a different one, sorry.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
Ok, made some quick runs with Black Death at 1920x1080 resolution and I think you find out something interesting in results. Mind you I did not clear cache before or between the tests, it MIGHT have an effect but anyway..here settings and numbers! CCC Settings, Performance driver 11.12 from AMD Antialiasing Mode : Use application settings, Morphological filtering OFF, Filter Standard. Anisotropic Filtering : Use application settings Tessellation: AMD Optimized (I think has no effect in CoD whatsoever) Catalyst AI : Performance, Surface optimization Off Vertical refresh : On, unless application specifies Triple Buffer : Off (OpenGL setting only) First runs I ran at what I had from my 6970HD. Cache was NOT cleared nor game restarted between runs in any phaze. In-game settings... Full Screen : On Antialiasing : Off(in all tests) Epilepsy : Off (in ALL tests) SSAO : Off Vsync : On Model detail : High Building detail : High Land Detail : High Forest : Low Visual effects : Medium Texture Quality : High Damage decals : High Buidlings amount : Unlimited Land shading : High Grass : Off Shadows : On Roads : On Black Death ran once to load textures. Then the benchmarking run with FPS counter on. Counter was reset on each run to get consistent results. Minimum: 10fps Maximum: 68fps Average: 45fps Next run with VSync OFF, otherwise all remained same. Minimum: 10fps Maximum: 112fps Average 48fps Next run with SSAO ON, VSync Off. Otherwise similar settings. This was interesting! Minimum: 10fps Maximum: 111fps Average: 47fps Next run SSAO ON, VSync ON. Otherwise similar settings. Again interesting! Minimum: 10fps Maximum: 67fps Average: 44fps Then I changed graphics settings to VERY HIGH, VSync ON. Interesting average, should run another run? Minimum: 5fps Maximum: 67fps Average: 34fps Last run VERY HIGH, VSync OFF. Interesting results again.. Minimum: 5fps Maximum: 112fps Average: 45fps So here a quick and dirty testing. Will do some cahce clearing and other tweaks. My system runs ALL at STOCK speeds, no overclocking. Signature for more info ![]() Last edited by Flanker35M; 01-24-2012 at 04:28 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Welcome to the land of Big VCards Flanker.
I ran the Spit vs 110 track. so you have a compare. Vsync on i get . maximum 68fps (spikes) minimum 60fps, average 60FPS! Vsync off avg FPS 89 Max 118 My nvidia settings all standard except I set me pre rendered frames to 8
__________________
__________________ Win7, 64bit Ultra Asus P8P67Pro MB Intel i7-2600K Coursair 16GB (4x 4GB), DDR3-1600MHz Gainward Nvidia 580GTX 3GB DDR5 850-Watt Modular Power Supply WIN7 and COD on Gskill SSD 240GB 40" Panasonic LCD TrackIR5 + Thrustmaster Warthog stick, throttle & pedals |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No real point in comparing FPS. The game is so unoptimized over land it's just a mess. It should easily pull 100fps on full detail over land without any stuttering.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Removable Rack
Kingwin K450-1062 SATA KF-811 CPU AMD 8 Core FX-8150 3.6G CPU Cooler Thermalright Silver Arrow Operating System MS Windows 7 Professional 64 BIT Mother Board Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 Rev 1 DVD Burner Asus DRW 24B1ST /Black/B/AS/OEM Case Cooler Master Storm Enforcer ATX Mid Tower Case Power Supply Cooler Master GX 750 Watt Memory Kingston Hyper X 8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 240 pin DIMM 16 GB Total Hard drive for Storage Seagate Barracuda ST2000DM001 2 Terabyte SATA 7200 RPM 68 MB SATA-6GB/S Item # TSD-2000ASV Model ST2000DM001 Hard Drive for operating system Sandisk SDSSDX-120G-G25 Extreme 2.5 SATA III 6 GB/S Staples # 730645 Sandisk Model# SDSSDX-120G-G25 Video Card Gigabyte GV-R797D5-3GD-B Radeon HD 7970 3GB 384-BIT GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0x16 HDCP ready, Cross Fire X, Direct X 11, Open GL4.2 and Eyefinity The Gigabyte card is out of stock at newegg so it may be a few weeks before it is in stock again. Will this set up be OK for CoD ? anyone run CoD in windows 7 with 64 bit environment ? as soon as I get the video card and install it I will update on the forum here. Dasstuka |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
That system should run any game just fine and the upcoming patch will increase performance further. Please update, will be interesting to see what kind of figures you will get ![]() |
![]() |
|
|